Vita et al v. AT&T, Inc.
David Vita, Daniel Mariscal, Charles Fairchild and Faith Brown |
AT&T, Inc. |
5:2024cv02356 |
April 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Nathanael M Cousins |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Property |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1). Case transferred to Northern District of Texas re MDL 3114 In Re: AT&T Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation. Signed by MDL Panel on 6/14/2024. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2024) |
Remark : IT notified of transfer (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2024) |
Remark - Case transferred from California Northern has been opened in Northern District of Texas as case 3:24-cv-01465, filed 06/14/2024. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2024) |
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING #9 Defendant AT&T's Unopposed Motion to Stay Responsive Pleading Deadline Pending Consolidation Decision. Any party may move to vacate the stay at any time. Furthermore, the parties are ordered to file a joint status report by 12/2/2024, if a decision on consolidation has not been issued by that time. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2024) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Stay DEFENDANT AT&T INC.S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE PENDING CONSOLIDATION DECISION filed by AT&T, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 6/19/2024 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor before Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Responses due by 5/24/2024. Replies due by 5/31/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cutts, Kyle) (Filed on 5/10/2024) |
Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Entities by AT&T, Inc. (Cutts, Kyle) (Filed on 5/10/2024) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyle Thomas Cutts (Cutts, Kyle) (Filed on 5/10/2024) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Vita, Faith Brown, Charles Fairchild, Daniel Mariscal. AT&T, Inc. served on 4/23/2024, answer due 5/14/2024. (Loeser, Thomas) (Filed on 4/26/2024) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/17/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/24/2024 10:00 AM in San Jose, - Videoconference Only. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2024) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to AT&T, Inc.. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2024) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/6/2024. (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2024) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Loeser, Thomas) (Filed on 4/19/2024) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Class Action Complaint) against AT&T, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19338688.). Filed by David Vita, Faith Brown, Charles Fairchild, Daniel Mariscal. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of David Vita Re: CLRA Venue)(Loeser, Thomas) (Filed on 4/19/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.