Hudson v. Andes
| Toriano Germaine Hudson, Sr. |
| Warden Chance Andes |
| 5:2024cv05442 |
| August 20, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward J Davila |
| PSLC HHL |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Toriano Germaine Hudson, Sr. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2024) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Chance Andes. Filed by Toriano Germaine Hudson, Sr. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2024) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File 1983 Complaint by Mail filed by Toriano Germaine Hudson, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2024) |
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH GENERAL ORDER NO. 76 OR SHOW GOOD CAUSE FOR RELIEF FROM ELECTRONIC FILING REQUIREMENT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/24/2024. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). A copy of this Order and ECF No. 1, including complaint and IFP application were mailed to Plaintiff
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Statement of Account. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2024) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE: The Clerk has received plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is directed to submit within 72 hours and in PDF form a certified Prison Trust Account statement for the plaintiff, Toriano Germaine Hudson Sr. AX4560, reflecting the last six months activity, to cdcrfilings@cand.uscourts.gov. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 1 CLERKS NOTICE: The filer failed to submit this S.1983 complaint through the email procedures required by General Order No. 76. If the filer does not, by the deadline below, either resubmit the documents through the email procedures or file a motion seeking permission to file the complaint by mail, this case will be dismissed without prejudice. Email resubmission deadline: 9/3/2024 (Attachments: #1 Lodged Complaint, #2 Lodged IFP, #3 Envelope) (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hudson v. Andes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Toriano Germaine Hudson, Sr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Warden Chance Andes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
