Harris v. Doe et al
Marvin Harris |
Contra Costa County Defention Facility, Sgt. Hoischer, John Doe, Sheriff #64572 and Sgt. Toreetc |
5:2024cv05584 |
August 21, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
Edward J Davila |
PSLC HHL |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/11/2024. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). A copy of this Judgment was mailed to Plaintiff. |
![]() |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 9/30/2024. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 Inmate Ledger filed by Marvin Harris. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2024) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Contra Costa County Defention Facility, John Doe, Hoischer, Sheriff #64572, Toreetc. Filed by Marvin Harris. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.