Agrawal v. Univ.of Okla. Board of Regents
| NEWTON AGRAWAL, PhD |
| UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA BOARD OF REGENTS, DBA University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center at Oklahoma City |
| 08-6110 |
| May 14, 2008 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [9804989] Returned mail filed. Addressed to: Newton Agrawal. Reason returned: attempted - not known, unable to forward. [Entered: 10/08/2010 12:40 PM] |
| [9773237] Case file closed. Shipment to records center due 06/20/2012. [Entered: 06/21/2010 09:29 AM] |
[9771716] Order filed by Judges Briscoe, Kelly and McKay denying Appellant's "Motion to Seal the Record" filed by Appellant Newton Agrawal. Served on 06/15/2010. [Entered: 06/15/2010 08:02 AM]
|
| [9771099] Appellant's "Application to Seal the Record", which may be construed as a motion to seal the case, filed by Newton Agrawal. Served on 06/08/2010. Manner of Service: US mail. [Entered: 06/11/2010 02:45 PM] |
| [9685069] Returned mail filed. Addressed to: Newton Agrawal Reason returned: attempted - not known. [Entered: 08/17/2009 01:13 PM] |
| [9674573] Pro se motion titled "Motion to Seal Pleadings of the Order and Judgment of June 10th, 2009. Petition to Recall the Mandate and Amend the Order and Judgment" received from Newton Agrawal but not filed. Served on 07/08/2009. Manner of Service: US mail.--[Edited 07/14/2009 by CP, response letter sent to appellant] [Entered: 07/10/2009 02:43 PM] |
| This entry has been removed from the docket. It was entered in error. Please response sent 07/14/2009 attached to the 07/10/2009 entry. [Entered: 07/24/2009 03:44 PM] |
| [9672042] Mandate issued. [Entered: 07/02/2009 07:38 AM] |
| [9666126] Affirmed; Terminated on the merits after submissions without oral hearing; Written, signed, unpublished; Judges Kelly (authoring), McKay and Briscoe. Mandate to issue. [Entered: 06/10/2009 10:09 AM] |
|
[9666121] Order filed by Judges Kelly, McKay and Briscoe denying as moot Appellee's motion to dismiss case filed by University of Oklahoma Board of Regents and granting Appellee's motion to seal appellee's brief and supplemental appendix and Appellant's motion to seal appellant's brief as contained in the court's final order. This is a text only entry. [Entered: 06/10/2009 10:06 AM]
|
| [9633178] Appellee's SEALED brief filed by University of Oklahoma Board of Regents. Original and 7 copies. Served on: 02/06/2009. Manner of service: email. Oral argument requested? n. SEALED Appendix filed. Original and 1 copies. Appendix pages: 286. Appellant's reply brief due 02/23/2009 by Newton Agrawal. [Entered: 02/09/2009 03:57 PM] |
| [9631195] Order filed by Clerk of the Court (LSS) provisionally granting Appellee's motion to seal brief and supplemental appendix. The ultimate propriety of keeping the answer brief and supplemental appendix sealed is referred to the panel of judges that will decide this appeal on the merits. Served on 02/02/2009. [Entered: 02/02/2009 03:56 PM] |
| [9631193] Appellee's motion to seal answer brief and supplemental appendix filed by University of Oklahoma Board of Regents. Served on 02/02/2009. Manner of Service: e-mail. [Entered: 02/02/2009 03:53 PM] |
| [9624612] Appellant's SEALED brief filed by Newton Agrawal. Original and 7 copies. Served on 12/12/2008 by email. Oral argument requested? n. SEALED Appendix filed. Original and 1 copy. Appendix pages: 142. [Entered: 01/08/2009 12:34 PM] |
| [9624724] Order filed by Clerk of the Court, the court reserves judgment on the appellee's motion to dismiss. The motion to dismiss along with the response, the supplement to the motion, and the appellant's reply will be referred to the panel selected to handle this appeal. Briefing on the merits may proceed. Appellee's brief now due 02/09/2009 for University of Oklahoma Board of Regents. Served on 01/08/2009. [Entered: 01/08/2009 02:50 PM] |
| [9624598] Order filed by Clerk of the Court (KTC) provisionally granting Appellant's motion to seal the opening brief. The ultimate decision of keeping the opening brief under seal is referred to the merits panel. Served on 01/08/2009. [Entered: 01/08/2009 12:14 PM] |
| [9624443] Reply filed by University of Oklahoma Board of Regents in support of their motion to dismiss. [ # 9619506-2 ] Served on 01/07/2009. Manner of Service: email. [Entered: 01/08/2009 08:39 AM] |
| [9624559] District court motion to view sealed materials and transcript received from Newton Agrawal but not filed. Served on 01/05/2009. Manner of Service: e-mail. [Entered: 01/08/2009 11:13 AM] |
| [9623659] Appellant's motion filed by Newton Agrawal to seal opening brief. Served on 12/31/2008. Manner of Service: e-mail. [Entered: 01/06/2009 09:44 AM] |
| [9623224] Response filed by Newton Agrawal to [ # 9621886-2 ], order. Served on 12/31/2008. Manner of Service: US mail. [Entered: 01/05/2009 08:46 AM] |
| [9621886] Order filed by Clerk of the Court (ktc) Attorney Valerie A. Williford, counsel for Appellant shall file a response to Appellee's motion to dismiss case. Attorney response due on 12/31/2008 for Newton Agrawal. Served on 12/23/2008. Failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of this appeal. [Entered: 12/23/2008 03:43 PM] |
| [9621903] Order filed by Clerk of the Court (KTC)-- Appellant must file an electronic submission of Appellant's brief. Appellant's electronic brief is due 12/31/2008. Appellant must serve and file an appropriate motion to file the opening brief under seal in this court. Appellant must attach to this motion copies of relevant district court orders. Attorney Williford is warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of this appeal. Motion due on 12/31/2008 for Newton Agrawal. Served on 12/23/2008. [Entered: 12/23/2008 04:38 PM] |
| [9619544] Supplement with exhibits to appellee's motion to dismiss filed by University of Oklahoma Board of Regents. Served on 12/15/2008. Manner of Service: email. [Entered: 12/16/2008 08:10 AM] |
| [9619506] Appellee's motion to dismiss case filed by University of Oklahoma Board of Regents. Served on 12/12/2008. Manner of Service: email. [Entered: 12/16/2008 06:52 AM] |
| [9615978] Deficiency notice issued. Type of deficiency: failure to file. Appellant's brief and appendix due on 12/12/2008 for Newton Agrawal. [Entered: 12/02/2008 11:03 AM] |
| [9611772] Appellant's deficient brief filed by Newton Agrawal. Type of deficiency: the brief was not e-submitted. There is no statement of jurisdiction, no statement of facts, no statement of standard of review and no attachments of decision being reviewed. Appellant's brief and Appendix due on 11/24/2008 for Newton Agrawal. [Entered: 11/13/2008 01:01 PM] |
| [9601023] Filed notice record is complete. Served on 09/30/2008. Manner of Service:. Appellant's brief and appendix due on 11/10/2008 for Newton Agrawal. [Entered: 09/30/2008 11:45 AM] |
| [9596923] Transcript order form filed by Tracy Washbourne and Valerie A. Williford for Newton Agrawal. Transcript due 10/15/2008 for Tracy Washbourne. [Entered: 09/16/2008 03:04 PM] |
| [9596390] Recalled mandate returned from district court. [Entered: 09/15/2008 08:53 AM] |
| [9593860] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. The issue of this courts appellate jurisdiction will not be resolved at this time, and is being referred to the panel that will ultimately be assigned to hear the case on the merits after briefing. Within 10 days from the date of this order, the appellant shall file a transcript order form with the district court and provide a copy to this court, even if no transcript is being requested. See Tenth Cir. R. 10.1(A) and (B). Transcript order form due 09/17/2008 for Valerie A. Williford. Served on 09/03/2008. [Entered: 09/03/2008 11:04 AM] |
| [9593720] Appellee's response to [ # 9586455-2 ],Appellant's memo brief filed by University of Oklahoma Board of Regents. Served on 09/02/2008. Manner of Service: email. [Entered: 09/03/2008 08:00 AM] |
|
[9591092] Order filed by Judges Kelly and McConnell granting Appellant's motion to reinstate appeal and recalling the mandate. Mandate return from District Court due 09/05/2008.; Appellee's memorandum brief due 09/02/2008 for University of Oklahoma Board of Regents. Served on 08/21/2008. [Entered: 08/21/2008 09:37 AM]
|
| [9589978] Appellee's response to [ # 9586152-3 ], order filed on 07/31/2008 filed by University of Oklahoma Board of Regents. Served on 08/15/2008. Manner of Service: email. [Entered: 08/15/2008 04:39 PM] |
| [9586455] Appellant memorandum brief filed by Newton Agrawal. Original and 7 copies. Served on 07/17/2008. Manner of Service: US mail. [Entered: 08/01/2008 11:42 AM] |
| [9586152] Order filed by Clerk of the Court, response to Appellant's motion to reinstate appeal due on 08/15/2008 for University of Oklahoma Board of Regents. The response shall also address the "Appellant's Memorandum Brief" and the question of whether, if this court granted the motion to reinstate, there would be any basis for this court to exercise appellate jurisdiction. Served on 07/31/2008. [Entered: 07/31/2008 12:40 PM] |
| [9586047] Appellant's motion filed by Newton Agrawal to reinstate appeal. Served on 07/30/2008. Manner of Service: email. [Entered: 07/31/2008 08:40 AM] |
| [9584574] Frap 42;Procedural termination without judicial action. [Entered: 07/24/2008 09:26 AM] |
| [9584576] Mandate issued. [Entered: 07/24/2008 09:27 AM] |
| [9582219] Notice of appearance filed by Valerie A. Williford for Newton Agrawal. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 07/14/2008. Manner of Service: email. [Entered: 07/14/2008 11:58 AM] |
| [9580532] Notice of appearance filed by Ms. Peggy L. Clay for University of Oklahoma Board of Regents. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 07/03/2008. Manner of Service: email. [Entered: 07/03/2008 03:16 PM] |
| [9579896] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting Appellant's motion to extend time to file memo brief. Appellant's memorandum brief due 07/17/2008 for Newton Agrawal. Served on 07/01/2008. [Entered: 07/01/2008 12:00 PM] |
| [9579279] Fee paid. Date paid in District Court on 06/27/2008. [Entered: 06/27/2008 04:36 PM] |
| [9579276] Appellant's motion filed by Newton Agrawal to extend time to file memorandum brief until 07/17/2008. Served on 06/27/2008. Manner of Service: email. [Entered: 06/27/2008 04:16 PM] |
| [9576939] Deficiency notice issued. Type of deficiency: failure to file memorandum brief and pay filing fee. Appellant's memorandum brief pursuant to the May 15, 2008 order, due 06/27/2008 for Newton Agrawal, Fee is due by 06/27/2008 for Newton Agrawal. [Entered: 06/17/2008 03:30 PM] |
| [9572802] Notice of appearance filed by Mr. Joseph Harroz, Jr. for University of Oklahoma Board of Regents. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 05/28/2008. Manner of Service: US mail. [Entered: 05/29/2008 03:14 PM] |
| [9569953] Jurisdiction challenged. Appellant's memorandum brief due 06/05/2008 for Newton Agrawal. Within 21 days from the date of this order, Mr. Agrawal must pay the $455.00 appellate filing fee to the district court (see Fed. R. App. P. 3(e)) and must also file with this court a memorandum stating what judgment, order, or part thereof he seeks to appeal and the basis in federal law for this courts jurisdiction to hear an appeal from that order, including a showing of timeliness of the notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The court will then review the memorandum and determine whether the appeal should be dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Alternatively, Mr. Agrawal may elect to simply do nothing and allow this attempted appeal to lapse, in which case it will be administratively dismissed after 21 days for failure to prosecute in accordance with Tenth Circuit Rule 42.1. [Entered: 05/15/2008 02:18 PM] |
| [9569992] Preliminary record on appeal filed. SEALED district court docket entry #52 - minute entry. [Entered: 05/15/2008 03:21 PM] |
| [9569540] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 05/13/2008 Notice of appearance due on 06/13/2008 for Newton Agrawal, and Notice of appearance due on 05/29/2008 for University of Oklahoma Board of Regents. Fee or ifp forms due 06/13/2008 for Newton Agrawal. [Entered: 05/14/2008 02:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Agrawal v. Univ.of Okla. Board of Regents | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: NEWTON AGRAWAL, PhD | |
| Represented By: | Valerie Williford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA BOARD OF REGENTS, DBA University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center at Oklahoma City | |
| Represented By: | Peggy L. Clay |
| Represented By: | Shawnae E. Robey |
| Represented By: | Matthew R. Stangl |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
