Union Pacific Railroad v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Ex rel, United States of America
Case Number: 08-7102
Filed: November 3, 2008
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 5, 2010 Union Pacific Railroad v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 920100105 Opinion
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Union Pacific Railroad v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Represented By: Robert D. Hart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Ex rel, United States of America
Represented By: Thomas Mark Bondy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?