Ochoa v. Workman
Petitioner - Appellant: GEORGE OCHOA
Respondent - Appellee: RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Case Number: 10-6088
Filed: April 9, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 18, 2012 Summary Ochoa v. Workman

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 1018779113 [9934962] Affirmed;Terminated on the merits after oral hearing;Written, signed, published;. Judges Murphy, author, Hartz, concurring and Holmes. Mandate to issue February 9, 2012.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ochoa v. Workman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: GEORGE OCHOA
Represented By: James Lee Hankins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Represented By: Seth S. Branham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?