Browning v. Workman
Petitioner - Appellee: MICHAEL ALLEN BROWNING
Respondent - Appellant: RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Case Number: 11-5102
Filed: July 15, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 6, 2013 Summary Browning v. Trammell

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 1019048370 [10069017] Affirmed; Terminated on the merits after oral hearing; Written, signed, published;. Judges Lucero, Tymkovich (author) and Holmes. Mandate to issue May 28, 2013. [11-5102]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Browning v. Workman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellee: MICHAEL ALLEN BROWNING
Represented By: Jack Dwayne Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellant: RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Represented By: Jennifer L. Strickland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?