Fletcher, et al v. United States, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM S. FLETCHER, individually, and as member of the Osage Development Council, and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated and CHARLES A. PRATT, individually, and as member of the Osage Development Council
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, KENNETH SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and LARRY ECHOHAWK, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs
Case Number: 12-5078
Filed: April 30, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Voting

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 17, 2013 Summary Fletcher, et al v. United States, et al

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Fletcher, et al v. United States, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: WILLIAM S. FLETCHER, individually, and as member of the Osage Development Council, and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated
Represented By: Jason Bjorn Aamodt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: CHARLES A. PRATT, individually, and as member of the Osage Development Council
Represented By: Jason Bjorn Aamodt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Joseph H. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Represented By: Joseph H. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
Represented By: Joseph H. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: KENNETH SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Represented By: Joseph H. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: LARRY ECHOHAWK, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs
Represented By: Joseph H. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?