Gross v. Progressive Therapy Systems, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: DALE GROSS
Defendant - Appellee: PROGRESSIVE THERAPY SYSTEMS, P.C. and PETER BRIGGS, therapist at Progressive Therapy Systems, P.C.
Case Number: 13-1421
Filed: October 11, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gross v. Progressive Therapy Systems, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DALE GROSS
Represented By: Alison Ruttenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: PROGRESSIVE THERAPY SYSTEMS, P.C.
Represented By: Brian Seth Emeson
Represented By: Charles Ephraim Welton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: PETER BRIGGS, therapist at Progressive Therapy Systems, P.C.
Represented By: Brian Seth Emeson
Represented By: Charles Ephraim Welton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?