Kaysville City v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Plaintiff - Appellant: KAYSVILLE CITY, a municipal corporation
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP., In its capacity as receiver for Barnes Banking Company and in its corporate capacity
Case Number: 13-4011
Filed: January 25, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 13, 2014 Kaysville City v. Federal Deposit Insurance

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kaysville City v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: KAYSVILLE CITY, a municipal corporation
Represented By: Robert C. Gross
Represented By: Felshaw King
Represented By: Brennan H. Moss
Represented By: Gifford W. Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP., In its capacity as receiver for Barnes Banking Company and in its corporate capacity
Represented By: Matthew L. Anderson
Represented By: Jared Carl Bennett
Represented By: Lina Dhiraj Soni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?