Lewis v. Twenty-First Century Bean
| ANTHONY LEWIS |
| TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY BEAN PROCESSING |
| 15-3188 |
| August 18, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10338449] Mandate issued. [15-3188] [Entered: 01/28/2016 07:50 AM] |
| [10332164] Affirmed; Terminated on the merits after submissions without oral hearing; Written, signed, unpublished. Judges Gorsuch, McKay and Bacharach (author). Mandate to issue. [15-3188] [Entered: 01/06/2016 09:19 AM] |
| [10309550] Minute order filed - Appellant's reply brief due on 10/26/2015 for Anthony Lewis. (Text Only - No Attachment) [15-3188] [Entered: 10/09/2015 01:33 PM] |
| [10309078] Appellee/Respondent's brief filed by Twenty-First Century Bean Processing. 8 paper copies to be provided to the court. Served on: 10/08/2015. Manner of service: US mail. Oral argument requested? No. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [15-3188] RMP [Entered: 10/08/2015 01:24 PM] |
| [10300646] Appellant brief filed by Mr. Anthony Lewis. Original and Served on 09/04/2015 by email. Oral argument requested? n. Required 10th Cir. R. 28.2 Attachments Included? y. Appellee's brief due 10/08/2015 for Twenty-First Century Bean Processing [15-3188] [Entered: 09/08/2015 01:48 PM] |
| [10300645] Notice of appearance filed by Mr. Anthony Lewis. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 09/04/2015. Manner of Service: US mail [15-3188] [Entered: 09/08/2015 01:47 PM] |
| [10296107] Notice of appearance submitted by Ryan M. Peck and Diane S. Worth for Appellee Twenty-First Century Bean Processing for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 08/20/2015. Manner of Service: US mail, email. [15-3188]--[Edited 08/20/2015 by KLP to delete the attachment; entry filed.] RMP [Entered: 08/20/2015 09:11 AM] |
| [10296133] Notice of appearance filed by Mr. Ryan M. Peck and Ms. Diane S. Worth for Twenty-First Century Bean Processing. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 08/20/2015. Manner of Service: US mail. [15-3188] [Entered: 08/20/2015 10:03 AM] |
| [10296270] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1. Volume I - Pleadings. [15-3188] [Entered: 08/20/2015 01:49 PM] |
| [10296272] Jurisdictional review complete. Appellant's brief due on 09/29/2015 for Anthony Lewis. [15-3188] [Entered: 08/20/2015 01:50 PM] |
| [10295688] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 08/18/2015. Notice of appearance due on 09/17/2015 for Anthony Lewis and on 09/01/2015 for Twenty-First Century Bean Processing. [15-3188] [Entered: 08/18/2015 03:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lewis v. Twenty-First Century Bean | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ANTHONY LEWIS | |
| Represented By: | Anthony Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY BEAN PROCESSING | |
| Represented By: | Ryan M. Peck |
| Represented By: | Diane H. Sorensen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
