Gerald H. Phipps, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co
| GERALD H. PHIPPS, INC., DBA GH Phipps Construction Company, a Colorado corporation |
| TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation |
| 16-1039 |
| February 5, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Gerald H. Phipps, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gerald H. Phipps, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: GERALD H. PHIPPS, INC., DBA GH Phipps Construction Company, a Colorado corporation | |
| Represented By: | Heather Hodgson |
| Represented By: | Dennis B. Polk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Steve Hearing |
| Represented By: | John Roger Mann |
| Represented By: | John M. Palmeri |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
