Robinson v. Coffman, et al
| PATRICK FIRMAN, PHIL WEISER, KENNETH LAFF, BETH MCCANN and CYNTHIA COFFMAN |
| DAVID WAYNE ROBINSON |
| 19-1147 |
| April 22, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10652929] Miscellaneous documents received from Mr. David Wayne Robinson but not filed. A response was sent on 06/03/2019 and is attached to this entry. [19-1147] [Entered: 06/03/2019 11:39 AM] |
| [10651824] Returned mail filed. Addressed To: Appellant. Reason Returned: Not at address, Return to Sender, Unable to Foward. Document Returned: The Court's 05/20/2109 dismissal order. Action Taken: None. [19-1147] [Entered: 05/29/2019 09:06 AM] |
| [10649951] Mandate issued. [19-1147] [Entered: 05/20/2019 02:47 PM] |
| [10649948] Default; Procedural termination without judicial action; Clerk of the Court. [19-1147] [Entered: 05/20/2019 02:47 PM] |
| [10644505] District court order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. [19-1147] [Entered: 04/26/2019 03:51 PM] |
| [10643515] Order filed by Clerk of the Court to show cause. On or before 05/15/2019 for David Wayne Robinson must show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing on the merits of this appeal is suspended pending further order of this court. Served on 04/24/2019. [19-1147] [Entered: 04/24/2019 08:48 AM] |
| [10643073] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 04/22/2019. Notice of appearance due on 05/22/2019 for David Wayne Robinson. [19-1147] [Entered: 04/22/2019 02:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
