Neilsen v. McElderry, et al
| JOHN AND JANE DOE and MAGGIE M. MCELDERRY |
| THOMAS NEILSEN |
| 19-1318 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10683678] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Vol. 1-pleadings. [19-1318] [Entered: 10/02/2019 08:02 AM] |
| [10683456] Jurisdictional review complete. Appellant's brief due on 11/12/2019 for Thomas Neilsen. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 10/22/2019 [19-1318] [Entered: 10/01/2019 12:02 PM] |
| [10678501] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Chris Alber for Maggie M. McElderry. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 09/13/2019. Manner of Service: US mail [19-1318] [Entered: 09/13/2019 04:28 PM] |
| [10678498] Entry of appearance submitted by Chris Alber for Appellee Maggie M. McElderry1978 for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 09/13/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1318] [Edited to remove PDF as pleading has been filed-- Edited 09/13/2019 by NA] CA [Entered: 09/13/2019 04:23 PM] |
| [10677704] Entry of appearance filed by Thomas Neilsen. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 09/11/2019. Manner of Service: hand delivery [19-1318] [Entered: 09/11/2019 03:24 PM] |
| [10674848] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 08/30/2019. Notice of appearance due on 09/13/2019 for John and Jane Doe and Maggie M. McElderry, and Notice of appearance due on 09/30/2019 for Thomas Neilsen. [19-1318] [Entered: 08/30/2019 09:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
