Branch v. United Parcel Service
| UNITED PARCEL SERVICE |
| LARRY BRANCH |
| 19-1357 |
| September 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10694859] Order filed by Clerk of the Court - The pleading received November 12 from the appellant does not address the jurisdictional issue. .Appellant's memorandum brief due 11/29/2019 for Larry Branch. Failure to file a compliant memorandum brief may result in dismissal of this appeal without further notice. Served on 11/14/2019. [19-1357] [Entered: 11/14/2019 08:01 AM] |
| [10694857] Miscellaneous pleading filed by Larry Branch. Served on 11/12/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1357] [Entered: 11/14/2019 07:58 AM] |
| [10694714] Fee paid. Date paid in District Court on 11/13/2019. [19-1357] [Entered: 11/13/2019 02:41 PM] |
| [10686531] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting in part, appellant's request to extend time to file memorandum brief, entry of appearance and fee/ifp motion. Appellant's memorandum brief now due 11/12/2019. The entry of appearance and motion for leave to proced in forma pauperis remain due 10/21/2019. Served on 10/11/2019. [19-1357] [Entered: 10/11/2019 08:57 AM] |
| [10686443] Appellant's motion filed by Larry Branch to extend time to file notice of appearance, memorandum and to pay fees/file ifp forms until 11/19/2019 or later. Served on 10/10/2019. Manner of Service: hand delivery. [19-1357] [Entered: 10/10/2019 04:44 PM] |
| [10683816] Entry of appearance submitted by David T. Barton for Appellee United Parcel Service for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 10/02/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1357]--[Edited 10/02/2019 by LG to remove PDF from entry, as pleading was filed on 10/2/2019] DTB [Entered: 10/02/2019 11:19 AM] |
| [10683820] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. David T. Barton for United Parcel Service. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 10/02/2019. Manner of Service: email [19-1357] [Entered: 10/02/2019 11:29 AM] |
| [10680256] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 09/20/2019. Fee or ifp forms due 10/21/2019 for Larry Branch. Notice of appearance due on 10/21/2019 for Larry Branch, and Notice of appearance due on 10/04/2019 for United Parcel Service. [19-1357] [Entered: 09/20/2019 02:19 PM] |
| [10680300] Jurisdiction challenged. Briefing on the merits is tolled pending further order of this court, however all preliminary documents must still be filed. Appellant's memorandum brief due 10/11/2019 for Larry Branch. See order for details. Served on 09/20/2019. [19-1357] [Entered: 09/20/2019 03:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Branch v. United Parcel Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE | |
| Represented By: | David T. Barton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: LARRY BRANCH | |
| Represented By: | Larry Branch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
