Giles v. Alto Partners
ALTO PARTNERS LLLP |
SAMUEL K. GILES |
19-1381 |
October 11, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10700865] Appellant/Petitioner's brief filed by Samuel K. Giles. 4 (Pro se) paper copies to be provided to the court. Served on 12/09/2019 by email. Oral argument requested? Yes. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-1381] SKG [Entered: 12/09/2019 12:43 PM] |
[10693576] Appellant's motion filed by Samuel K. Giles for permission to file electronically. Served on 11/06/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-1381] [Entered: 11/08/2019 02:06 PM] |
[10693642] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting Appellant/petitioner motion for permission to file electronically. See order for details and additional information. Served on 11/08/2019. [19-1381] [Entered: 11/08/2019 03:01 PM] |
[10691518] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 3. Comments: Vol. I - Pleadings; Vol. II - Pleadings; Vol, III - Transcripts. [19-1381] [Entered: 11/01/2019 10:20 AM] |
[10691061] Jurisdictional review complete. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 11/20/2019. Appellant's brief due on 12/09/2019 for Samuel K. Giles. [19-1381] [Entered: 10/30/2019 02:12 PM] |
[10691059] Entry of appearance filed by Samuel K. Giles. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n (party listed was previously disclosed). Served on 10/28/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1381] [Entered: 10/30/2019 02:11 PM] |
[10691056] Notice received from Samuel K. Giles that a transcript is not necessary for this appeal. [19-1381] [Entered: 10/30/2019 02:08 PM] |
[10691051] Consent to electronic service filed by Samuel K. Giles. Served on 10/28/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1381] [Entered: 10/30/2019 02:06 PM] |
[10689765] Entry of appearance submitted by Jason B. Robinson for Appellee Alto Partners LLLP for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 10/24/2019. Manner of Service: email, US mail. [19-1381]--[Edited 10/24/2019 by LG to remove PDF from entry, as pleading was filed on 10/24/2019] JBR [Entered: 10/24/2019 02:50 PM] |
[10689787] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Jason Bryce Robinson for Alto Partners LLLP. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 10/24/2019. Manner of Service: email [19-1381] [Entered: 10/24/2019 03:29 PM] |
[10687212] Fee paid. Date paid in District Court on 10/15/2019. [19-1381] [Entered: 10/15/2019 03:43 PM] |
[10686722] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 10/11/2019 Notice of appearance due on 10/25/2019 for Alto Partners LLLP, and Notice of appearance due on 11/12/2019 for Samuel K. Giles. Fee or ifp forms due 11/12/2019 for Samuel K. Giles. [19-1381] [Entered: 10/11/2019 01:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Giles v. Alto Partners | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: ALTO PARTNERS LLLP | |
Represented By: | Jason Bryce Robinson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: SAMUEL K. GILES | |
Represented By: | Samuel K. Giles |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.