Smith v. Chapdelaine, et al
RAY A. SMITH |
JOHN CHAPDELAINE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO |
19-1409 |
October 25, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10703877] Appellant's motion filed by Ray A. Smith for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Served on 11/20/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1409] [Entered: 12/19/2019 11:06 AM] |
[10703874] Appellant brief and application for certificate of appealability filed by Ray A. Smith. Original and 4 copies(made by the Clerk's Office). Served on 12/10/2019 by US mail. [19-1409] [Entered: 12/19/2019 11:03 AM] |
[10695437] Copy of district court order denying a certificate of appealability received from Ray A. Smith but not filed. [19-1409] [Entered: 11/15/2019 11:42 AM] |
[10692413] Jurisdictional review complete. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 11/26/2019. Fee or ifp forms, certificate of appealability, and Appellant's brief due on 12/16/2019 for Ray A. Smith. [19-1409] [Entered: 11/05/2019 10:10 AM] |
[10692533] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 4, Comments: Volumes 1-3 pleadings, Volume 4-state court record (2 envelopes containing 15 CDs). Hard copy filed in volume. [19-1409] [Entered: 11/05/2019 12:35 PM] |
[10692412] Order filed by Clerk of the Court lifting the abatement of this appeal and relieving appellant of his obligation to file a status report. The court will provide further instructions about the prosecution of this appeal. Served on 11/05/2019. [19-1409] [Entered: 11/05/2019 10:08 AM] |
[10692317] District court order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. [19-1409] [Entered: 11/05/2019 08:09 AM] |
[10692202] Notification of denial of certificate of appealability in district court. Appellant's motion for certificate of appealability filed (NOA - See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)). [19-1409] [Entered: 11/04/2019 02:57 PM] |
[10691610] Entry of appearance filed by Ray A. Smith. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 10/28/2019. Manner of Service: US mail (court only). [19-1409] [Entered: 11/01/2019 12:28 PM] |
[10690204] Entry of appearance submitted by Ryan A. Crane for Appellees The Attorney General of the State of Colorado and Mr. John Chapdelaine for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 10/28/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1409]--[Edited 10/28/2019 by AT to remove PDF as pleading was filed on 10/28/2019.] RC [Entered: 10/28/2019 10:43 AM] |
[10690215] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Ryan Crane for The Attorney General of the State of Colorado and Mr. John Chapdelaine. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 10/28/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1409] [Entered: 10/28/2019 11:08 AM] |
[10690370] Order filed by Judges Bacharach and Phillips partially remanding case to the district court to consider whether to issue a COA for this appeal. Pending a decision by the district court, this appeal is abated. On or before 11/27/2019, Appellant shall file a written status report advising this court as to the status of the remand proceedings regarding a COA. When the district court issues its decision regarding a COA, the Clerk of the district court is directed to supplement the preliminary record. Served on 10/28/2019. [19-1409] [Entered: 10/28/2019 02:24 PM] |
[10689848] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 10/24/2019. Fee or ifp forms due 11/25/2019 for Ray A. Smith. Notice of appearance due on 11/08/2019 for John Chapdelaine and The Attorney General of the State of Colorado, and Notice of appearance due on 11/25/2019 for Ray A. Smith. [19-1409] [Entered: 10/25/2019 08:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.