Niecko v. Jaques, et al
| TERRY JAQUES and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO |
| CHRISTOPHER ALAN NIECKO |
| 19-1443 |
| November 18, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10703078] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting Appellant's motion to dismiss case. Served on 12/17/2019. Text only entry - no attachment. [19-1443] Final order to be found in case termination entry. [Entered: 12/17/2019 08:06 AM] |
| [10703081] Frap 42; Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted. Procedural termination without judicial action; Clerk of the Court. [19-1443] [Entered: 12/17/2019 08:07 AM] |
| [10703082] Mandate issued. [19-1443] [Entered: 12/17/2019 08:08 AM] |
| [10702925] Appellant's motion filed by Christopher Alan Niecko to dismiss case. Served on 12/12/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1443] [Entered: 12/16/2019 03:25 PM] |
| [10699939] Supplemental preliminary record filed. Contents: District Court orders denying COA, IFP and motion to alter or amend. [19-1443] [Entered: 12/04/2019 02:29 PM] |
| [10699938] Order filed by Clerk of the Court lifting the abatement of this appeal. Appellant's motion to withdraw is taken under advisement. Within 14 days from the date of this order, Appellant shall file a motion or statement with this court indicating whether he wishes to voluntarily dismiss this appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). See order for additional information. Response due on 12/18/2019 for Christopher Alan Niecko. Served on 12/04/2019. [19-1443] [Entered: 12/04/2019 02:28 PM] |
| [10699931] Appellant's motion filed by Christopher Alan Niecko to withdraw 28 USC 2254. Served on 12/04/2019. Manner of Service: email by clerk. [19-1443] [Entered: 12/04/2019 02:20 PM] |
| [10699930] Request for rules received from Christopher Alan Niecko but not filed. Served on 12/04/2019. Manner of Service: email by clerk. [19-1443] [Entered: 12/04/2019 02:19 PM] |
| [10699401] Entry of appearance submitted by Lisa Michaels for Appellees Colorado Attorney General and Terry Jaques for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 12/03/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1443]--[Edited 12/03/2019 by LG to remove PDF from entry, as pleading was filed on 12/3/2019] LM [Entered: 12/03/2019 10:43 AM] |
| [10699406] Entry of appearance filed by Lisa Michaels for Colorado Attorney General and Terry Jaques. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 12/03/2019. Manner of Service: email [19-1443] [Entered: 12/03/2019 10:52 AM] |
| [10699933] Motion to proceed by FRAP 24, Motion under 28 USC 2253, Motion for request for a certificate of appealability received from Christopher Alan Niecko but not filed. Served on 12/04/2019. Manner of Service: email by clerk. [19-1443] [Entered: 12/04/2019 02:23 PM] |
[10697450] Order filed by Judges Bacharach and Phillips remanding the case to the district court for a ruling on a certificate of appealability. Pending a decision by the district court, this appeal is abated. Status report due 12/23/2019 by Christopher Alan Niecko. See order for details. Served on 11/22/2019. [19-1443] --[Edited docket text 11/25/2019 by SLS to add judges.] [Entered: 11/22/2019 01:01 PM]
|
| [10695799] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 11/18/2019. Fee or ifp forms due 12/18/2019 for Christopher Alan Niecko (pending in district court). Notice of appearance due on 12/02/2019 for Colorado Attorney General and Terry Jaques, and Notice of appearance due on 12/18/2019 for Christopher Alan Niecko. [19-1443] [Entered: 11/18/2019 11:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
