Scott v. Cary, et al
JOHN DOE, Stevenson Cary's Supervisor at Aurora Police Department |
LYNN EUGENE SCOTT |
CITY OF AURORA and STEVENSON CARY |
19-1464 |
December 6, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10713027] Paper copies of appellants brief and appendix received from Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. [19-1464] [Entered: 01/27/2020 08:53 AM] |
[10711939] Entry of appearance filed by Lynn Eugene Scott. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 01/20/2020. Manner of Service: email. [19-1464] [Entered: 01/22/2020 12:47 PM] |
[10711325] Appellant/Petitioner's brief filed by Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. Served on 01/21/2020 by US mail. Oral argument requested? No. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-1464] JB [Entered: 01/21/2020 12:21 PM] |
[10711327] Appellant's appendix filed by Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. Total number of volumes filed: 1. Served on 01/21/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-1464] JB [Entered: 01/21/2020 12:25 PM] |
[10711348] Minute order filed - the brief and appendix submitted by appellant is accepted for filing. Paper copies shall now be filed with the court within 5 business days of this order. All copies must be exact replicas of the electronic filings, including all attachments and number of volumes filed for appendices. Appellee's brief now due 02/20/2020 for Lynn Eugene Scott. Paper copies of appellant's brief and appendix due 01/28/2020 by Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. (Text Only - No Attachment) [19-1464] [Entered: 01/21/2020 12:36 PM] |
[10710226] Deficiency notice issued. Type of deficiency: not filed. Notice of appearance due on 01/21/2020 for Lynn Eugene Scott. [19-1464] [Entered: 01/16/2020 07:09 AM] |
[10702214] Filed notice record is complete. Served on 12/12/2019. Appellants' brief and appendix due on 01/21/2020 for Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. [19-1464] [Entered: 12/12/2019 04:38 PM] |
[10702144] Notice received from Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora that a transcript is not necessary for this appeal. Served on: 12/12/2019. Manner of Service: US mail [19-1464] JB [Entered: 12/12/2019 02:41 PM] |
[10702139] Docketing statement filed by Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. Served on 12/12/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1464] JB [Entered: 12/12/2019 02:39 PM] |
[10702153] Minute order filed - Notice due that record is complete by 12/19/2019 for Jeffrey P. Colwell, Clerk of Court. (Text Only - No Attachment) [19-1464] [Entered: 12/12/2019 02:46 PM] |
[10702156] Entry of appearance submitted by Julia A. Bannon and Isabelle Sabra Evans for Appellants Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 12/12/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1464]--[Edited 12/12/2019 by AT to removw PDF as pleading was filed on 12/12/2019.] JB [Entered: 12/12/2019 02:46 PM] |
[10702177] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Julia Bannon, Esq. and Isabelle Sabra Evans for City of Aurora and Stevenson Cary. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 12/12/2019. Manner of Service: email, US mail [19-1464] [Entered: 12/12/2019 03:22 PM] |
[10700657] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 12/06/2019. Docketing statement, transcript order form and entry of appearance due 12/20/2019 for Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. Notice of appearance due on 01/06/2020 for Lynn Eugene Scott [19-1464] [Entered: 12/06/2019 03:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.