Scott v. Cary, et al
Defendant: JOHN DOE, Stevenson Cary's Supervisor at Aurora Police Department
Plaintiff / Appellee: LYNN EUGENE SCOTT
Defendant / Appellant: CITY OF AURORA and STEVENSON CARY
Case Number: 19-1464
Filed: December 6, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 5, 2020 Scott v. Cary

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2020 [10713027] Paper copies of appellants brief and appendix received from Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. [19-1464] [Entered: 01/27/2020 08:53 AM]
January 22, 2020 [10711939] Entry of appearance filed by Lynn Eugene Scott. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 01/20/2020. Manner of Service: email. [19-1464] [Entered: 01/22/2020 12:47 PM]
January 21, 2020 [10711325] Appellant/Petitioner's brief filed by Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. Served on 01/21/2020 by US mail. Oral argument requested? No. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-1464] JB [Entered: 01/21/2020 12:21 PM]
January 21, 2020 [10711327] Appellant's appendix filed by Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. Total number of volumes filed: 1. Served on 01/21/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-1464] JB [Entered: 01/21/2020 12:25 PM]
January 21, 2020 [10711348] Minute order filed - the brief and appendix submitted by appellant is accepted for filing. Paper copies shall now be filed with the court within 5 business days of this order. All copies must be exact replicas of the electronic filings, including all attachments and number of volumes filed for appendices. Appellee's brief now due 02/20/2020 for Lynn Eugene Scott. Paper copies of appellant's brief and appendix due 01/28/2020 by Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. (Text Only - No Attachment) [19-1464] [Entered: 01/21/2020 12:36 PM]
January 16, 2020 [10710226] Deficiency notice issued. Type of deficiency: not filed. Notice of appearance due on 01/21/2020 for Lynn Eugene Scott. [19-1464] [Entered: 01/16/2020 07:09 AM]
December 12, 2019 [10702214] Filed notice record is complete. Served on 12/12/2019. Appellants' brief and appendix due on 01/21/2020 for Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. [19-1464] [Entered: 12/12/2019 04:38 PM]
December 12, 2019 [10702144] Notice received from Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora that a transcript is not necessary for this appeal. Served on: 12/12/2019. Manner of Service: US mail [19-1464] JB [Entered: 12/12/2019 02:41 PM]
December 12, 2019 [10702139] Docketing statement filed by Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. Served on 12/12/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1464] JB [Entered: 12/12/2019 02:39 PM]
December 12, 2019 [10702153] Minute order filed - Notice due that record is complete by 12/19/2019 for Jeffrey P. Colwell, Clerk of Court. (Text Only - No Attachment) [19-1464] [Entered: 12/12/2019 02:46 PM]
December 12, 2019 [10702156] Entry of appearance submitted by Julia A. Bannon and Isabelle Sabra Evans for Appellants Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 12/12/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-1464]--[Edited 12/12/2019 by AT to removw PDF as pleading was filed on 12/12/2019.] JB [Entered: 12/12/2019 02:46 PM]
December 12, 2019 [10702177] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Julia Bannon, Esq. and Isabelle Sabra Evans for City of Aurora and Stevenson Cary. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 12/12/2019. Manner of Service: email, US mail [19-1464] [Entered: 12/12/2019 03:22 PM]
December 6, 2019 [10700657] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 12/06/2019. Docketing statement, transcript order form and entry of appearance due 12/20/2019 for Stevenson Cary and City of Aurora. Notice of appearance due on 01/06/2020 for Lynn Eugene Scott [19-1464] [Entered: 12/06/2019 03:25 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Scott v. Cary, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: LYNN EUGENE SCOTT
Represented By: Lynn Eugene Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CITY OF AURORA
Represented By: Isabelle Sabra Evans
Represented By: Julia Bannon Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: STEVENSON CARY
Represented By: Isabelle Sabra Evans
Represented By: Julia Bannon Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE, Stevenson Cary's Supervisor at Aurora Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?