Smith v. Barker, et al
JERRY ROARK, STEVEN SALAZAR, PPMU MR. COOK, ANTHONY A. DECESARO, NANETTE THOMAS, SHAWNA GONZALES, DIANNA MILENSKI, SANDRA BROWN, MARSHALL GRIFFITH and SUSAN BARKER |
RODNEY A. SMITH |
19-1469 |
December 13, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10703421] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Vol 1 - pleadings. Record on appeal filed 12/18/2019. [19-1469] [Entered: 12/18/2019 06:58 AM] |
[10703061] Jurisdictional review complete. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 01/07/2020. [19-1469] [Entered: 12/17/2019 07:42 AM] |
[10703059] Order filed by Clerk of the Court lifting abatement and reactivating case. Appellant's entry of appearance due on or before 01/13/2020. Appellant's brief and fee or 1915 forms are due on or before 01/27/2020 for Rodney A. Smith. Served on 12/17/2019. [19-1469] [Entered: 12/17/2019 07:41 AM] |
[10702892] District Court order filed denying motions in adverse to allegation of frivolous intent (ECF 19), appointment of counse (ECF 20), and for leave to proceed under 28 USC 1915 (ECF 21). [19-1469] [Entered: 12/16/2019 02:38 PM] |
[10702522] Order filed by Clerk of the Court abating case pending a ruling on ECF No. 19. Status report due 01/13/2020 or within 5 days after receiving notice of the district court's order for Rodney A. Smith. Served on 12/13/2019. [19-1469] [Entered: 12/13/2019 03:03 PM] |
[10702295] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 12/13/2019. Notice of appearance due on 01/13/2020 for Rodney A. Smith. [19-1469] [Entered: 12/13/2019 09:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.