Monasterio v. Greyhound Lines, et al
| BRIAN BROUILETTE |
| BILL BLAKENSHIP, CEO in charge of security and safety, JASON VON JIMENEZ, II, DAVID LEACH, President and CEO of Greyhoundlines, Inc. and JOHN DOES I-IV |
| GREYHOUND LINES, INC., AKA Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc. and ARNULFO BRAVO, employee of Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc. |
| CARLOS MONASTERIO |
| 19-2033 |
| February 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10636188] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting Appellant's motion to dismiss case. Served on 03/27/2019. Text only entry - no attachment. [19-2033] [Entered: 03/27/2019 08:51 AM] |
| [10636189] Frap 42; Procedural termination without judicial action; Clerk of the Court. [19-2033] [Entered: 03/27/2019 08:53 AM] |
| [10636191] Mandate issued. [19-2033] [Entered: 03/27/2019 08:54 AM] |
| [10636125] Motion filed by Appellant Carlos Monasterio to dismiss case. Served on: 03/26/2019. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-2033] JPV [Entered: 03/26/2019 04:04 PM] |
| [10632759] Order filed by Clerk of the Court upon review of appellant's docketing statement. Appellant's memorandum brief addressing the jurisdictional issue set for in the attached order due 03/26/2019 for Carlos Monasterio. Briefing on the merits is tolled pending further order of this court. See attached order for further information. Served on 03/12/2019.--[Edited 03/12/2019 by LAB to correct deadline in docket text.] [19-2033] [Entered: 03/12/2019 12:51 PM] |
| [10632616] Admissions letter sent. Response date set to 04/11/2019 for John Paul Valdez. [19-2033] [Entered: 03/12/2019 09:00 AM] |
| [10632542] Docketing statement filed by Carlos Monasterio. Served on 03/11/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-2033] JPV [Entered: 03/11/2019 05:43 PM] |
| [10632309] Entry of appearance submitted by Daniel H. Hernandez for Appellees Arnulfo Bravo and Greyhound Lines, Inc. for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 03/11/2019. Manner of Service: email.--[Edited 03/11/2019 by LAB to remove PDF from entry as pleading was filed 3/11/2019.] [19-2033] DHH [Entered: 03/11/2019 10:47 AM] |
| [10632314] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Daniel H. Hernandez, Sr. for Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Arnulfo Bravo. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 03/11/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-2033] [Entered: 03/11/2019 10:52 AM] |
| [10632438] Entry of appearance submitted by John P. Valdez & Roger C. Davie for Appellant Carlos Monasterio for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 03/11/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-2033] --[Edited 03/11/2019 by AT to remove PDF as pleading was filed on 3/11/2019.] JPV [Entered: 03/11/2019 02:17 PM] |
| [10632464] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Roger C. Davis and Mr. John Paul Valdez for Carlos Monasterio. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 03/11/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-2033] [Entered: 03/11/2019 02:44 PM] |
| [10629540] Fee paid. Date paid in District Court on 02/26/2019. [19-2033] [Entered: 02/27/2019 09:23 AM] |
| [10628962] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 02/25/2019. Fee is due by 03/11/2019 for Carlos Monasterio. Docketing statement, transcript order form and notice of appearance due 03/11/2019 for Carlos Monasterio. Notice of appearance due on 03/11/2019 for Arnulfo Bravo and Greyhound Lines, Inc. [19-2033] [Entered: 02/25/2019 11:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
