United States v. Adams
MIRANDA ADAMS |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-2146 |
September 11, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10677579] Criminal case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 09/11/2019. Docketing statement due 09/25/2019 for Miranda Adams. Notice of appearance due on 09/25/2019 for Miranda Adams and United States of America. A/Pet designation of record due 09/25/2019 for Miranda Adams. Transcript order form due 09/25/2019 for Miranda Adams. Appointment motion due 09/25/2019 by Miranda Adams. [19-2146] [Entered: 09/11/2019 11:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: United States v. Adams | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: MIRANDA ADAMS | |
Represented By: | Alonzo J. Padilla |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Kimberly Ann Eaton Brawley Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.