Dunn v. Smith, et al
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO and KEN SMITH |
KENNETH A. DUNN |
19-2208 |
December 11, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10716377] Appellant brief and application for certificate of appealability filed by Kenneth A. Dunn. Original and 4 copies. Served on 02/04/2020 by US Mail. [19-2208] [Entered: 02/07/2020 12:27 PM] |
[10715059] Appellant's motion filed by Kenneth A. Dunn for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.. Served on 01/29/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-2208] [Entered: 02/03/2020 02:24 PM] |
[10709185] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Vol. 1 - pleadings. [19-2208] [Entered: 01/13/2020 09:13 AM] |
[10708933] Jurisdictional review complete. Fee or ifp forms due by 02/19/2020 for Kenneth A. Dunn. Combined certificate of appealability and brief due on 02/19/2020 for Kenneth A. Dunn. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 01/31/2020. [19-2208] [Entered: 01/10/2020 01:31 PM] |
[10705972] Entry of appearance filed by Kenneth A. Dunn. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 12/17/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-2208] [Entered: 12/30/2019 12:38 PM] |
[10706096] Miscellaneous correspondence received from Kenneth A. Dunn but not filed. No certificate of service. [19-2208] [Entered: 12/30/2019 02:54 PM] |
[10701514] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 12/11/2019. Notice of appearance due on 01/10/2020 for Kenneth A. Dunn. Fee or ifp forms due in district court on 01/10/2020 for Kenneth A. Dunn. [19-2208] [Entered: 12/11/2019 11:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.