In re: Adkins
| In re: EBRAHIM ADKINS |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS |
| 19-3189 |
| September 3, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10675599] Petitioner's motion filed by Mr. Ebrahim Adkins for leave to proceed pro se. [19-3189] [Entered: 09/03/2019 04:57 PM] |
| [10675596] Case docketed. Petition for writ of mandamus filed. c/s: n. Fee or ifp forms and certificate of service due 10/03/2019 for Ebrahim Adkins. DATE RECEIVED: 09/03/2019. [19-3189] [Entered: 09/03/2019 04:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Adkins | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: EBRAHIM ADKINS | |
| Represented By: | Ebrahim Adkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS | |
| Represented By: | Kristafer R. Ailslieger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
