Portnov v. United States Dept of Justice, et al
| ABRAHAM PORTNOV |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEBORAH A. BYNUM, Assistant Director, CHAD READLER, Acting Assistant Attorney General, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., Director and STEVEN C. HOUGH, Trial Attorney, United States Department of Justice |
| 19-4057 |
| April 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
[10650533] Order filed by Judges Hartz, Bacharach and Carson denying the Petition construed as a petition for rehearing filed by Appellant Abraham Portnov. [19-4057] [Entered: 05/22/2019 09:05 AM]
|
| [10650284] Petition for rehearing filed by Abraham Portnov. Served on 05/15/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-4057] --[Edited 05/22/2019 by DD to modify docket text] [Entered: 05/21/2019 01:36 PM] |
| [10646119] Miscellaneous correspondence received from Mr. Abraham Portnov but not filed. Served on 04/25/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-4057]--[Edited 05/03/2019 by JM. A court response was sent to Mr. Portnov on 5/3/19. ] [Entered: 05/03/2019 01:16 PM] |
| [10646118] Pro se Entry of Appearance received from Mr. Abraham Portnov but not filed. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-4057] [Entered: 05/03/2019 01:15 PM] |
| [10642353] Jurisdictional Defect; Procedural termination after other judicial action; Written, unsigned, unpublished; Judges Hartz, Bacharach and Carson. [19-4057] [Entered: 04/18/2019 12:50 PM] |
| [10641820] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 04/16/2019 Notice of appearance due on 05/16/2019 for Abraham Portnov. [19-4057] [Entered: 04/16/2019 04:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
