Gunter v. Pulsipher
| DAVID GUNTER |
| CORY PULSIPHER |
| 19-4060 |
| April 23, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10654314] Response filed by David Gunter to [ # 10649075-2 ] order. Served on 06/07/2019. Manner of Service: Clerk via email. [19-4060] [Entered: 06/07/2019 01:15 PM] |
| [10651383] Returned mail filed. Addressed To: David Gunter at Davis County Jail. Reason Returned: Unable to forward. Document Returned: 5/16/19 Order. Action Taken: Remailed to new address at Iron County Correctional Facility. [19-4060] [Entered: 05/24/2019 03:47 PM] |
| [10651327] Notice of change of address filed by David Gunter. [19-4060] [Entered: 05/24/2019 02:32 PM] |
| [10649075] Order filed by Clerk of the Court directing Mr. Gunter to provide proof that he has complied with Rule 4(c)(1). Response now due by 06/06/2019 for David Gunter. Briefing on the merits remains suspended. Served on 05/16/2019. [19-4060] [Entered: 05/16/2019 09:16 AM] |
| [10647521] Entry of appearance filed by David Gunter. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y (Already disclosed.) Served on 05/01/2019. Manner of Service: US mail [19-4060] [Entered: 05/09/2019 12:10 PM] |
| [10647523] Letter in response to this court's 4/26/19 order received from David Gunter but not filed. Served on 05/01/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-4060] [Entered: 05/09/2019 12:14 PM] |
| [10644322] Jurisdiction challenged as set forth in the attached order. Appellant's memorandum brief due 05/17/2019 for David Gunter. If Appellant chooses not to respond or does not file a timely response, the attempted appeal will be dismissed without further notice to the parties. Briefing is suspended, but the deadlines set in the 04/23/2019 letter remain in place. [19-4060] [Entered: 04/26/2019 11:06 AM] |
| [10643748] Entry of appearance submitted by Mark C. Field for Appellee Cory Pulsipher for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 04/24/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. --[Edited 04/24/2019 by MLB to remove pdf from docket, entry filed on 4/24/19][19-4060] MF [Entered: 04/24/2019 04:08 PM] |
| [10643752] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Mark Field for Cory Pulsipher. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 04/24/2019. Manner of Service: US mail [19-4060] [Entered: 04/24/2019 04:12 PM] |
| [10643384] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 04/23/2019. Notice of appearance due on 05/23/2019 for David Gunter, and Notice of appearance due on 05/07/2019 for Cory Pulsipher. Fee or ifp forms due 05/23/2019 for David Gunter. [19-4060] [Entered: 04/23/2019 01:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gunter v. Pulsipher | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DAVID GUNTER | |
| Represented By: | David Gunter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: CORY PULSIPHER | |
| Represented By: | Mark Field |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
