Urquiza v. Allbaugh
| ALEJANDRO URQUIZA |
| JOE ALLBAUGH |
| 19-5066 |
| July 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10678086] Appellant's appendix filed by Alejandro Urquiza. Total number of volumes filed: 2. Served on 09/12/2019. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-5066] SDM [Entered: 09/12/2019 03:50 PM] |
| [10678056] Errata sheet filed by Alejandro Urquiza to Appellant's Motion for Certificate of Appealability. 0 paper copies to be provided to the court. Served on 09/12/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-5066] SDM [Entered: 09/12/2019 03:02 PM] |
| [10677056] Notice of appellant's deficient motion for certificate of appealability and appendix received from Alejandro Urquiza. See attached letter for specifics. Errata sheet and corrected appendix due on 09/19/2019 for Alejandro Urquiza. [19-5066] [Entered: 09/09/2019 02:30 PM] |
| [10676624] Motion filed by Appellant Alejandro Urquiza for issuance of certificate of appealability.. Served on: 09/06/2019. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-5066]--[Edited 09/12/2019 by JM corrected via errata sheet filed on 9/12/19.] SDM [Entered: 09/06/2019 01:38 PM] |
| [10676626] Appellant/Petitioner's brief filed by Alejandro Urquiza. 7 (Counseled) paper copies to be provided to the court. Served on 09/06/2019 by email. Oral argument requested? No. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-5066] SDM [Entered: 09/06/2019 01:41 PM] |
| This entry has been removed from the docket. [JMN PDF removed a corrected electronic appendix was filed on 9/12/19.] [10676631] Appellant's appendix filed by Alejandro Urquiza. Total number of volumes filed: 2. Served on 09/06/2019. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-5066] SDM [Entered: 09/06/2019 01:48 PM] |
| [10665903] Filed notice record is complete. Served on 07/25/2019. Appellant's brief and appendix due on 09/03/2019 for Alejandro Urquiza. [19-5066] [Entered: 07/25/2019 03:53 PM] |
| [10665662] Docketing statement filed by Alejandro Urquiza. Served on 07/25/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-5066] SDM [Entered: 07/25/2019 09:19 AM] |
| [10665577] Minute order filed - Notice due that record is complete by 08/01/2019 for Mark C. McCartt, Clerk of Court. (Text Only - No Attachment) [19-5066] [Entered: 07/25/2019 07:46 AM] |
| [10665571] Notice that a transcript is not necessary for this appeal filed by Alejandro Urquiza. Served on: 07/25/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-5066] --[Edited 07/25/2019 by SLS to correct docket event and text.] SDM [Entered: 07/25/2019 07:31 AM] |
| [10665001] Entry of appearance filed by Stanley D. Monroe for Alejandro Urquiza. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 07/23/2019. Manner of Service: email [19-5066] [Entered: 07/23/2019 08:59 AM] |
| [10664974] Entry of appearance submitted by Stanley D. Monroe for Appellant Alejandro Urquiza for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 07/23/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-5066] --[Edited 07/23/2019 by DD. Removed PDF as pleading filed 7/23/19] SDM [Entered: 07/23/2019 08:27 AM] |
| This entry has been removed from the docket because it does not include the certificate of interested parties. Counsel instructed to correct and resubmit. [SLS] [10664687] Entry of appearance submitted by Stanley D. Monroe for Appellant Alejandro Urquiza for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 07/22/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-5066] SDM [Entered: 07/22/2019 09:19 AM] |
| [10663713] Entry of appearance submitted by Jennifer B. Miller for Appellee Mr. Joe Allbaugh for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 07/17/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-5066] --[Edited 07/17/2019 by SLS to remove PDF from docket entry as the document has been filed.] JBM [Entered: 07/17/2019 12:33 PM] |
| [10663717] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Jennifer B. Miller for Mr. Joe Allbaugh. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 07/17/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-5066] [Entered: 07/17/2019 12:42 PM] |
| [10663273] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 07/15/2019. Docketing statement, transcript order form and notice of appearance due 07/30/2019 for Alejandro Urquiza. Notice of appearance also due on 07/30/2019 for Joe Allbaugh. [19-5066] [Entered: 07/16/2019 07:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Urquiza v. Allbaugh | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: ALEJANDRO URQUIZA | |
| Represented By: | Stanley D. Monroe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: JOE ALLBAUGH | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer B. Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
