In re: Rendon-Martinez
Petitioner: DOROTEO RENDON-MARTINEZ
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 19-6020
Filed: February 12, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2019 Opinion or Order [10628936-1] Denied; Terminated on the merits after submissions without oral hearing; Written, unsigned, unpublished; Final order filed by Judges Briscoe, O'Brien and Eid denying authorization to file a successive 2255. [19-6020] [Entered: 02/25/2019 10:55 AM]
February 12, 2019 [10626344] Case docketed. Petition for permission to file successive 2255 motion in district court. DATE RECEIVED: 02/11/2019. [19-6020] [Entered: 02/12/2019 02:49 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Rendon-Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DOROTEO RENDON-MARTINEZ
Represented By: Doroteo Rendon-Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Chris Michael Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?