In re: Dennis
| In re: LEROY DEAN DENNIS |
| CARL BEAR |
| 19-6066 |
| May 6, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
[10651121-1] Denied; Terminated on the merits after submissions without oral hearing; Written, unsigned, unpublished. Final order filed denying for successive 2254 by Judges Tymkovich, Lucero and Phillips. [19-6066] [Entered: 05/23/2019 04:18 PM]
|
| [10646425] Case docketed. Petition for permission to file successive 2254 habeas petition in district court. DATE RECEIVED: 05/02/2019 [19-6066] --[Edited 05/07/2019 by DD to correct date received] [Entered: 05/06/2019 11:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Dennis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: LEROY DEAN DENNIS | |
| Represented By: | Leroy Dean Dennis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: CARL BEAR | |
| Represented By: | Diane L. Slayton |
| Represented By: | E. Scott Pruitt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
