Johnson v. Patton
ROBERT PATTON |
ANTIONE DIRAY JOHNSON |
19-6179 |
December 9, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10715193] Appellant's motion filed by Antione Diray Johnson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Served on 01/27/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-6179] [Entered: 02/03/2020 04:49 PM] |
[10715191] Appellant 's brief and application for certificate of appealability filed by Antione Diray Johnson. Served on 01/27/2020 by US mail. [19-6179] [Entered: 02/03/2020 04:47 PM] |
[10710779] Objection to district court order filed by Antione Diray Johnson. Served on 01/08/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. (Attached response sent.) [19-6179] [Entered: 01/17/2020 12:37 PM] |
[10709990] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Volume 1 pleadings. [19-6179] [Entered: 01/15/2020 10:42 AM] |
[10708078] Jurisdictional review complete. Appellant's fee or ifp forms and combined opening brief and application for COA are due by 02/18/2020 for Antione Diray Johnson. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 01/29/2020 [19-6179] [Entered: 01/08/2020 10:00 AM] |
[10708077] District court order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. [19-6179] [Entered: 01/08/2020 09:53 AM] |
[10706043] Appellant's brief received from Antione Diray Johnson but not filed. Served on 12/23/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-6179] [Entered: 12/30/2019 02:04 PM] |
[10705996] Entry of appearance filed by Antione Diray Johnson. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 12/23/2019. Manner of Service: US mail [19-6179] [Entered: 12/30/2019 01:03 PM] |
[10703445] Supplemental preliminary record. Contents: notification of denial of certificate of appealability in district court. Appellant's motion for certificate of appealability filed (NOA - See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)). [19-6179] [Entered: 12/18/2019 07:59 AM] |
[10703715] Order filed by Clerk of the Court lifting the abatement. Appellant relieved of obligation to file status report. Entry of appearance and fees remain due 01/08/2020. Served on 12/18/2019. [19-6179] [Entered: 12/18/2019 02:31 PM] |
[10702758] Order filed by Judges Matheson and Phillips directing a limited remand to the district court to consider whether to issue a COA for this appeal. Pending a decision by the district court, this appeal is abated. Status report due 01/15/2020 by Antione Diray Johnson. The clerk of the district court is directed to supplement the preliminary record once a decision is issued. Served on 12/16/2019. [19-6179] [Entered: 12/16/2019 11:39 AM] |
[10700988] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 12/09/2019. Fee or ifp forms due 01/08/2020 for Antione Diray Johnson. Notice of appearance due on 01/08/2020 for Antione Diray Johnson. [19-6179] [Entered: 12/09/2019 04:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Johnson v. Patton | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: ROBERT PATTON | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: ANTIONE DIRAY JOHNSON | |
Represented By: | Antione Diray Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.