Araiza v. Barr
Petitioner: JORGE EDUARDO ARAIZA
Respondent: WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Case Number: 19-9568
Filed: August 30, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 22, 2020 Araiza v. Barr
April 7, 2020 Araiza v. Barr

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2020 Opinion or Order [10743907] Mandate issued. [19-9568] [Entered: 06/01/2020 08:29 AM]
April 7, 2020 Opinion or Order [10731291] Order filed by Clerk of the Court reopening appeal. [text only entery for internal purposes] [19-9568] [Entered: 04/07/2020 01:55 PM]
April 7, 2020 Opinion or Order [10731299] Denied;Terminated on the merits after submissions without oral hearing;Written, signed, unpublished; Judges Matheson (authoring) and Bacharach. Mandate to issue. [19-9568] [Entered: 04/07/2020 02:01 PM]
April 7, 2020 Opinion or Order [10731289] Order filed by Judges Matheson and Bacharach granting in part petition for rehearing filed by Jorge Eduardo Araiza. See order for details. Served on 04/07/2020. --[Edited 04/07/2020 by SDS to correct panel members] [19-9568] [Entered: 04/07/2020 01:53 PM]
March 30, 2020 Opinion or Order [10729339] Response filed by William Barr to Petitioner's Petition for Rehearing. Served on 03/30/2020. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-9568] WME [Entered: 03/30/2020 07:25 PM]
March 18, 2020 Opinion or Order [10726506] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Walter Manning Evans for William Barr. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 03/18/2020. Manner of Service: email [19-9568] [Entered: 03/18/2020 11:16 AM]
March 18, 2020 Opinion or Order [10726494] Entry of appearance submitted by Walter Manning Evans for Respondent William Barr for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 03/18/2020. Manner of Service: email. [19-9568]--[Edited 03/18/2020 by LG to remove PDF from entry, as pleading was filed on 3/18/2020] WME [Entered: 03/18/2020 11:09 AM]
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order [10725756] Order filed by Judges Matheson, McKay, and Bacharach directing respondent to file a response to the petition for rehearing. Response due on 03/30/2020 for William Barr. Served on 03/16/2020. [19-9568] [Entered: 03/16/2020 11:14 AM]
March 6, 2020 Opinion or Order [10723553] Petition for rehearing filed by Jorge Eduardo Araiza. 7 paper copies to be provided to the court. Served on 03/06/2020. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-9568] AE [Entered: 03/06/2020 07:48 PM]
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order [10732584] Denied;Terminated on the merits after submissions without oral hearing; Written, signed, unpublished;. Judges Matheson (authoring), McKay and Bacharach. Mandate to issue. --[Edited 04/14/2020 by GH to remove PDF; revised decision issued 4/7/2020] [19-9568] [Entered: 04/13/2020 01:57 PM]
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order [10699662] Minute order filed - Appellant's reply brief is due 12/23/2019 for Jorge Eduardo Araiza. (Text Only - No Attachment) [19-9568] [Entered: 12/04/2019 07:11 AM]
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order [10699260] Errata sheet filed by William Barr to BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT. Served on 12/02/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-9568] Rd [Entered: 12/02/2019 04:36 PM]
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order [10699026] Notice of appellee's deficient brief received from William Barr. See attached letter for specifics. Respondent brief (errata sheet) due 12/12/2019 for William Barr. [19-9568] [Entered: 12/02/2019 11:27 AM]
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order [10698160] Appellee/Respondent's brief filed by William Barr. 7 (Counseled) paper copies to be provided to the court. Served on: 11/26/2019. Manner of service: email. Oral argument requested? No. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-9568] --[Edited 12/02/2019 by AT - Brief cited as deficient on 12/2/2019 and amended on 12/2/2019 via errata sheet.] Rd [Entered: 11/26/2019 04:35 PM]
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order [10691675] Minute order filed - Respondent brief now due 11/27/2019 for William Barr. (Text Only - No Attachment) [19-9568] [Entered: 11/01/2019 01:24 PM]
October 28, 2019 Opinion or Order [10690488] Appellant/Petitioner's brief filed by Jorge Eduardo Araiza. 7 (Counseled) paper copies to be provided to the court. Served on 10/28/2019 by email. Oral argument requested? No. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [19-9568] AE [Entered: 10/28/2019 06:39 PM]
September 17, 2019 Opinion or Order [10679057] Agency record filed. Number of volumes filed: 1. [19-9568] TS [Entered: 09/17/2019 11:58 AM]
September 17, 2019 Opinion or Order [10679108] Minute order filed - Petitioner's brief due on 10/28/2019 for Jorge Eduardo Araiza. (Text Only - No Attachment) [19-9568] [Entered: 09/17/2019 01:05 PM]
September 12, 2019 Opinion or Order [10678065] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Aaron Elinoff for Jorge Eduardo Araiza. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 09/12/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-9568] [Entered: 09/12/2019 03:21 PM]
September 12, 2019 Opinion or Order [10678062] Docketing statement filed by Jorge Eduardo Araiza. Served on 09/12/2019. Manner of Service: email.--[Edited 09/12/2019 by LAB to remove entry of appearance as attachment-filed separately 9/12/19.] [19-9568] AE [Entered: 09/12/2019 03:15 PM]
September 4, 2019 [10675692] Entry of appearance submitted by Remi Da Rocha-Afodu for Respondent William Barr for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 09/04/2019. Manner of Service: email. [19-9568]--[Edited 09/04/2019 by LG to remove PDF from entry, as pleading was filed on 9/4/2019] Rd [Entered: 09/04/2019 09:00 AM]
September 4, 2019 [10675694] Entry of appearance filed by Remi da Rocha-Afodu for William Barr. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 09/04/2019. Manner of Service: email [19-9568] [Entered: 09/04/2019 09:04 AM]
August 30, 2019 [10674970] Petition for review filed. Original filed. Served on 08/30/2019. Manner of Service: email - Attorney for Respondents: DOH/EOIR/BIA, Oil, Tyler. Copy of petition served on party at address shown in 08/30/2019 letter. Fee pd:, Receipt #: 1046408779, Amount: $ 500.00. Docketing statement and notice of appearance due 09/13/2019 for Jorge Eduardo Araiza. Agency record due 10/09/2019 for William Barr.. Notice of appearance due on 09/13/2019 for William Barr [19-9568] [Entered: 08/30/2019 12:40 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Araiza v. Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Represented By: Oil Oil
Represented By: Lansing W. Tyler
Represented By: DOH/EOIR/BIA
Represented By: Remi da Rocha-Afodu
Represented By: Walter Manning Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JORGE EDUARDO ARAIZA
Represented By: Aaron Elinoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?