Reyes v. Larimer County Planning Dept., et al
GARY GERRARD, JEFF JENSEN and LARIMER COUNTY COMMUNITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT |
PEDRO REYES and TERESITA REYES |
20-1247 |
July 6, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Reyes v. Larimer County Planning Dept. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10765821] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. This matter is before the court on appellants "Motion for relief under 42 U.S.C 1320d, "Motion for Relief Under 42 U.S.C. 7401," and "Response to Defendants Response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief." The response is also a status report. Appellants also submitted a second opening brief, submitted on 8/20/2020.Appellants submitted their first opening brief on 8/04/2020. However, as this court's 8/12/2020 order stated, The due date for opening brief has not been set because proceedings are abated. Status report due 09/25/2020 by Pedro Reyes and Teresita Reyes.. Served on 08/26/2020. [20-1247] Please see order for additional detailed information. [Entered: 08/26/2020 03:50 PM] |
[10765798] Appellant/Plaintiffs' Response to Appellee Defendants' Response Motion (the response is also a status report) filed by Mr. Pedro Reyes and Teresita Reyes. Original. Served on 08/22/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-1247] [Entered: 08/26/2020 03:17 PM] |
[10765793] Brief in support with motion for relief under 42 U.S.C. 132od-6 Wrongful Disclosure of Individually Identifiable Health information and Motion for Relief Under 42 U.S.C. 7401. Congressional Findings and Declaration of Purpose with brief with in support received from Mr. Pedro Reyes but not filed. Served on 08/19/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-1247] [Entered: 08/26/2020 03:13 PM] |
[10762474] Order filed by Clerk of the Court - Taking Appellants' "Motion for Redaction of Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to [P]roceed on Appeal Without Prepayment of Costs of Fees," Motion for Relief Under 5 C.F.R. 1201.36 Consolidation and Joining of Appeals," and Motion for Relief Under 18 U.S.C. 1519 Obstruction of Justice" under advisement pending the lifting of the abatement of proceedings. The court is also in receipt of Appellants' Opening Brief. The opening brief shall show on the docket as received, but will not be formally filed at this time. See attached order for further details. [ # 10760221-2 ], [ # 10760224-2 ], [ # 10762461-2 ]. Served on 08/12/2020. [20-1247] [Entered: 08/12/2020 04:01 PM] |
[10760224] Appellants' motion filed by Mr. Pedro Reyes and Teresita Reyes to consolidate appeals ( Cases to be consolidated: 20-1247 and 19-1283 ). Served on 08/03/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-1247] [Entered: 08/04/2020 11:24 AM] |
[10762461] Plaintiff's Motion for Relief Under 18 U.S.C. 1519 and Brief in Support Obstruction of Justice filed by Mr. Pedro Reyes and Teresita Reyes. Served on 08/03/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-1247] [Entered: 08/12/2020 03:28 PM] |
[10762464] Appellants' Opening Brief received from Mr. Pedro Reyes and Teresita Reyes but not filed pursuant to the court's 08/12/2020 order. [20-1247] [Entered: 08/12/2020 03:31 PM] |
[10760221] Appellants' Motion for Redaction of Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Without Prepayment of Costs or Fees filed by Mr. Pedro Reyes and Teresita Reyes. Served on 08/03/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-1247] [Entered: 08/04/2020 11:21 AM] |
[10760216] Appellant's motion filed by Teresita Reyes for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Served on 08/03/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-1247] [Entered: 08/04/2020 11:16 AM] |
[10760213] Appellant's motion filed by Mr. Pedro Reyes for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Served on 08/03/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-1247] [Entered: 08/04/2020 11:15 AM] |
[10757578] Order filed by Clerk of the Court abating case peding dispostion of the Rule 60(b) motion in the district court. The due date for the opening brief is vacated. Status report due 08/24/2020 by Pedro Reyes and Teresita Reyes. See order for details. Served on 07/23/2020. [20-1247] [Entered: 07/23/2020 11:52 AM] |
[10756929] District court order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. Fee or ifp forms due 08/25/2020 for Pedro Reyes and Teresita Reyes. [20-1247] [Entered: 07/21/2020 02:44 PM] |
[10755651] Jurisdictional review complete. Appellants' brief due on 08/25/2020 for Pedro Reyes and Teresita Reyes. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 08/06/2020. [20-1247] [Entered: 07/16/2020 09:21 AM] |
[10755013] Entry of appearance submitted by Jeannine S. Haag and David P. Ayraud for Appellees Gary Gerrard, Jeff Jensen and Larimer County Community Planning Department for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 07/14/2020. Manner of Service: US mail.--[Edited 07/14/2020 by LAB to remove PDF from entry as pleading was filed 7/14/20.] [20-1247] JSH [Entered: 07/14/2020 12:29 PM] |
[10755037] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. David Ayraud and Ms. Jeannine Sue Haag for Jeff Jensen, Gary Gerrard and Larimer County Community Planning Department. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 07/14/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-1247] [Entered: 07/14/2020 01:05 PM] |
[10754475] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Pedro Reyes. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 07/10/2020. Manner of Service: US mail [20-1247] [Entered: 07/13/2020 12:07 PM] |
[10752366] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 07/06/2020. Notice of appearance due on 08/05/2020 for Pedro Reyes and Teresita Reyes, and Notice of appearance due on 07/20/2020 for Gary Gerrard, Jeff Jensen and Larimer County Community Planning Department. [20-1247] [Entered: 07/06/2020 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.