Pollack v. Miller
| REID POLLACK |
| POLLY MILLER |
| 20-1255 |
| July 9, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10765534] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting Appellant motion to extend time to file appellant brief. Appellant's brief due on 09/21/2020 for Reid Pollack (28-day extension). Served on 08/26/2020. [20-1255] [Entered: 08/26/2020 09:10 AM] |
| [10765499] Appellant's motion filed by Reid Pollack to extend time to file appellant's brief until 09/21/2020. Served on 08/25/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-1255] [Entered: 08/26/2020 08:32 AM] |
| [10761338] Notice filed by Reid Pollack of consent to service via email. Served on 08/05/2020 by US mail. [20-1255] [Entered: 08/07/2020 01:01 PM] |
| [10761339] Entry of appearance filed by Reid Pollack. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 08/05/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-1255] [Entered: 08/07/2020 01:02 PM] |
| [10757232] Supplemental record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Supplemental Volume 1-conventionally submitted material on 1-CD. Hard copy filed in volume. [20-1255] [Entered: 07/22/2020 12:38 PM] |
| [10755044] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 3, Comments: Vols. 1-3, pleadings (CD of conventionally submitted material will be docketed separately). [20-1255] [Entered: 07/14/2020 01:29 PM] |
| [10754292] Jurisdictional review complete. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 08/03/2020. Appellant's brief and notice of appearance due on 08/24/2020 for Reid Pollack. [20-1255] [Entered: 07/13/2020 08:16 AM] |
| [10754648] Entry of appearance submitted by David Hughes, Catherine R. Ruhland for Appellee Polly Miller for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 07/13/2020. Manner of Service: email.--[Edited 07/13/2020 by LAB to remove PDF from entry as pleading was filed 7/13/20.] [20-1255] CRR [Entered: 07/13/2020 03:23 PM] |
| [10754670] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. David Evan Hughes and Ms. Catherine R Ruhland for Polly Miller. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 07/13/2020. Manner of Service: email. [20-1255] [Entered: 07/13/2020 03:45 PM] |
| [10753854] Fee paid. Date paid in District Court on 07/09/2020. [20-1255] [Entered: 07/10/2020 07:12 AM] |
| [10753537] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 07/09/2020 Notice of appearance due on 07/23/2020 for Polly Miller. Notice of appearance due on 08/10/2020 for Reid Pollack. Fee or ifp forms due in district court on 08/10/2020 for Reid Pollack. [20-1255] [Entered: 07/09/2020 08:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Pollack v. Miller | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: REID POLLACK | |
| Represented By: | Reid Pollack |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: POLLY MILLER | |
| Represented By: | Catherine R. Ruhland |
| Represented By: | Dea Lindsey |
| Represented By: | David Evan Hughes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
