Smith v. Brown, et al
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO POLICE DEPARTMENT, NINA FOZ, UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO, NASH TORREZ, DOUGLAS M. BROWN, JESSICA HIDALGO HOLLAND, CAITLIN HENKE, PATRICIA YOUNG and TIM MAY |
| VICTOR SMITH |
| 20-2116 |
| August 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10767390] Mandate issued. [20-2116] [Entered: 09/02/2020 11:55 AM] |
| [10767387] Default. Procedural termination after other judicial action by Clerk of the Court. Written, unsigned, and unpublished. [20-2116] [Entered: 09/02/2020 11:51 AM] |
| [10762627] Jurisdiction challenged. Response due on 08/27/2020 for Victor Smith. See attached order for details. [20-2116] [Entered: 08/13/2020 09:26 AM] |
| [10762319] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 08/12/2020 Notice of appearance due on 09/11/2020 for Victor Smith. Fee or ifp forms due 09/11/2020 in district court for Victor Smith. [20-2116] [Entered: 08/12/2020 10:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.