Butler v. Becker, et al
| SHERRI BECKER, TRAVIS WRIGHT, AMBER LEE and WILL (LNU) |
| RICHARD C. BUTLER |
| 20-3131 |
| July 7, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10766936] Docketing statement on Supreme Court Court of Appeals State of Kansas form received from Richard C. Butler but not filed. Served on 08/23/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-3131] [Entered: 09/01/2020 09:56 AM] |
[10765208] Order filed by Judges Hartz, Bacharach and McHugh denying as unnecessary appellant's request an extension of time to respond to the jurisdictional show cause order. Appellant's petition for panel rehearing is also denied. [20-3131] [Entered: 08/25/2020 08:15 AM]
|
| [10765186] Appellant's motion filed by Richard C. Butler for extension of time (to file petition for rehearing). Served on 08/25/2020. Manner of Service: Clerk via email. [20-3131]--[Edited 08/25/2020 by KLP to correct the PDF.] [Entered: 08/25/2020 07:18 AM] |
| [10765191] Appellant's motion to reconsider and "order" (construed collectively as a petition for panel rehearing) filed by Richard C. Butler. Served on 08/19/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-3131] [Entered: 08/25/2020 07:41 AM] |
| [10764796] Miscellaneous correspondence received from Richard C. Butler but not filed. Dated 08/17/2020. (Attached response sent.) [20-3131] [Entered: 08/21/2020 03:40 PM] |
| [10762262] Jurisdictional Defect. Procedural termination after other judicial action. Written, unsigned, unpublished; Judges Hartz, Bacharach and McHugh. [20-3131] [Entered: 08/12/2020 08:42 AM] |
| [10761801] "Order" received from Richard C. Butler but not filed. Original. [20-3131] [Entered: 08/10/2020 03:53 PM] |
| [10761719] Appellant memorandum brief filed by Richard C. Butler. Served on 07/29/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-3131] [Entered: 08/10/2020 02:08 PM] |
| [10757910] Entry of appearance filed by Richard C. Butler. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 07/24/2020. Manner of Service: Clerk via email. [20-3131] [Entered: 07/24/2020 03:12 PM] |
| [10757234] Deficiency notice issued. Type of deficiency: appellees have not filed an entry of appearance. Notice of appearance due on 07/27/2020 for Sherri Becker, Amber Lee and Travis Wright. [20-3131] [Entered: 07/22/2020 12:41 PM] |
| [10757261] Entry of appearance submitted by Andrew D. Holder for Appellees Sherri Becker, Amber Lee and Mr. Travis Wright for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 07/22/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-3131] --[Edited 07/22/2020 by SLS to remove PDF from docket entry as the document has been filed.] ADH [Entered: 07/22/2020 01:23 PM] |
| [10757265] Entry of appearance filed by Andrew D. Holder for Travis Wright, Sherri Becker and Amber Lee. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 07/22/2020. Manner of Service: US mail. [20-3131] [Entered: 07/22/2020 01:31 PM] |
| [10754131] Order filed by Clerk of the Court considering this case for summary dismissal under 10 Cir. R. 27. Briefing on the merits is suspended pending further order of this court. Appellant's memorandum brief is due 08/06/2020 for Richard C. Butler. See order for additional information. Served on 07/10/2020. [20-3131] [Entered: 07/10/2020 02:50 PM] |
| [10752974] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 07/07/2020. Fee or 1915 forms and notice of appearance due 08/06/2020 for Richard C. Butler. Notice of appearance due on 07/21/2020 for Sherri Becker, Amber Lee and Travis Wright. [20-3131] [Entered: 07/07/2020 04:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
