Wyoming Refining v. EPA
| WYOMING REFINING COMPANY |
| UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY |
| 20-9636 |
| November 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10790900] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Jonathan G. Hardin for Wyoming Refining Company. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 12/04/2020. Manner of Service: email. [20-9636] [Entered: 12/04/2020 08:31 AM] |
| [10790999] Motion filed by Respondent EPA for attorney Samara M. Spence to withdraw as counsel. Served on: 12/04/2020. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [20-9636] SMS [Entered: 12/04/2020 11:26 AM] |
| [10791014] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting Samara M. Spence's motion to withdraw as attorney for the EPA. Caitlin McCusker remains as counsel for the EPA. Served on 12/04/2020. [20-9636] [Entered: 12/04/2020 11:46 AM] |
| [10790848] Docketing statement filed by Wyoming Refining Company. Served on 12/04/2020. Manner of Service: email. [20-9636] JGH [Entered: 12/04/2020 06:44 AM] |
| [10790847] Entry of appearance submitted by Jonathan G. Hardin for Petitioner Wyoming Refining Company for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 12/04/2020. Manner of Service: email. [20-9636] --[Edited 12/04/2020 by AT to remove PDF as pleading was filed on 12/4/2020.] JGH [Entered: 12/04/2020 06:43 AM] |
| [10789821] Entry of appearance submitted by Caitlin McCusker for Respondent EPA for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 12/01/2020. Manner of Service: email. [20-9636]--[Edited 12/01/2020 by LG to remove PDF from entry, as pleading was filed on12/1/2020] CM [Entered: 12/01/2020 05:44 AM] |
| [10789848] Entry of appearance filed by Caitlin McCusker for EPA. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 12/01/2020. Manner of Service: email [20-9636] [Entered: 12/01/2020 08:00 AM] |
| [10789237] Petition for review filed. Served on 11/27/2020. Manner of Service: email - Attorney for Respondents: Clark, Holmstead, Spence. Copy of petition served on party at address shown in 11/27/2020 letter. Fee pd:Check #: credit card, Receipt #: A10-47924-196, Amount: $ $500. Docketing statement due 12/11/2020 for Wyoming Refining Company. Agency record due 01/06/2021 for United States Environmental Protection Agency. Notice of appearance due on 12/11/2020 for United States Environmental Protection Agency and Wyoming Refining Company [20-9636] [Entered: 11/27/2020 01:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Wyoming Refining v. EPA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Bossert Clark Esq. Sr. |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Holmstead |
| Represented By: | Caitlin McCusker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: WYOMING REFINING COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan G. Hardin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
