O'Rourke, et al v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al
CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE, MARGE BOSTELMAN, individually, MARK L. THOMSEN, PRISCILLA CHAN, individually, TONY EVERS, individually, JOCELYN BENSON, individually, BRIAN KEMP, Individually, ROBERT F. SPINDELL, JR., individually, and Does 1-10,000, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, KATHY BOOCKVAR, individually, DEAN KNUDSON, individually, JULIE M. GLANCEY, TOM WOLF, individually, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, individually, ANA S. JACOBS, individually, MARK E. ZUCKERBERG, individually and GRETCHEN WHITMER, individually |
NATHANIEL L. CARTER, ALVIN CRISWELL, LARRY D. COOK, KESHA CRENSHAW, AMIE TRAPP, NEIL YARBROUGH, LORI CUTUNILLI and KEVIN O'ROURKE |
21-1161 |
April 30, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Civil Rights Voting |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
O'Rourke, et al. v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.