Blake v. United States
| ALPHONSO BLAKE, JR. |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 21-1419 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10879196] Order filed by Clerk of the Court - The district court has denied appellant's "motion to alter or amend the judgment". Abatement of this apeal is lifted. Served on 12/14/2021. [21-1419] [Entered: 12/14/2021 07:29 AM] |
| [10879201] Frap 42; Procedural termination without judicial action. Appellant's Notice of Non-Participation Does Not Wish to Participate in the Appeal is construed as a motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal. So construed, the motion for voluntary dismissal is granted and this appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b); 10th Cir. R. 27.5(A)(9). A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court. [21-1419] [Entered: 12/14/2021 07:40 AM] |
| [10879202] Mandate issued. [21-1419] [Entered: 12/14/2021 07:40 AM] |
| [10879197] Notice of Non-Participation Does Not Wish to Participate in the Appeal filed by Alphonso Blake, Jr.. Served on 12/13/2021. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-1419] [Entered: 12/14/2021 07:32 AM] |
| [10877552] Entry of appearance submitted by Kyle Brenton for Appellee United States of America for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 12/07/2021. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-1419]--[Edited 12/07/2021 by AT to remove PDF as pleading was filed on 12/7/2021.] KWB [Entered: 12/07/2021 11:08 AM] |
| [10877565] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Kyle W. Brenton for United States of America. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 12/07/2021. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-1419] [Entered: 12/07/2021 11:38 AM] |
| [10879031] District Court order filed. Denying appellant's post judgment motion on12/06/2021. [21-1419] [Entered: 12/13/2021 02:03 PM] |
| [10876880] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. This matter is before the court following the opening of this appeal. A review of the district court docket shows a pending motion to alter or amend the judgment. Accordingly, this appeal is abated. See order for detailed information. abating. Served on 12/03/2021. [21-1419] [Entered: 12/03/2021 11:11 AM] |
| [10876663] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 12/02/2021. Notice of appearance due on 01/03/2022 for Alphonso Blake Jr., and Notice of appearance due on 12/16/2021 for United States of America. Fee or ifp forms due 01/03/2022 for Alphonso Blake Jr.. [21-1419] [Entered: 12/02/2021 03:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Blake v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ALPHONSO BLAKE, JR. | |
| Represented By: | Alphonso Blake Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Laura J. Ellis |
| Represented By: | Logan Ann Steiner |
| Represented By: | Kyle W. Brenton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
