Sharp v. Garza, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DONALD SHARP
Defendant / Appellee: CARMEN E. GARZA, LAURA FASHING, MARTHA VAZQUEZ, District Director, KEA W. RIGGS, STEVEN C. YARBROUGH, GREGORY B. WORMUTH, JOHN F. ROBBENHAAR, Esq. and ALL FEDERAL JUDGES OF THE UNITED STATES
Case Number: 21-2127
Filed: October 20, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order [10879765] Order filed by Judges Bacharach and Phillips. Appellant filed a document on 12/7/2021 which the court has construed as appellant's reponse to the show cause order. The court concludes that the provisions of PLRA apply to this appeal. Fee is due by 01/05/2022 for Donald Sharp. Served on 12/15/2021. [21-2127] See order for detailed information. [Entered: 12/15/2021 02:54 PM]
December 10, 2021 [10878582] Notice of deficient motion received from Appellant Donald Sharp for writ of Mandamus. Type of deficiency: No certificate of service on the district court judge and any opposing parties. Served on 12/04/2021. Manner of Service: US Mail. Corrected motion due 12/20/2021 for Donald Sharp. [21-2127] [Entered: 12/10/2021 02:03 PM]
December 7, 2021 [10877724] Opening brief received from Donald Sharp but not filed. Served on 12/01/2021. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-2127] [Entered: 12/07/2021 04:44 PM]
December 7, 2021 [10878768] Moton to Discharge construed as a response to order filed by Donald Sharp. Served on 12/01/2021. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-2127] [Entered: 12/13/2021 09:18 AM]
November 30, 2021 [10875558] Returned mail filed. Addressed To: Donald Sharp @ Otero County Prison Facility. Reason Returned: Could not ID. Document Returned: 11/09/2021 order. Action Taken: Remailed to address currently on file (Cibola County). [21-2127] [Entered: 11/30/2021 09:38 AM]
November 22, 2021 [10874170] Returned mail filed. Addressed To: Donal Sharp. Reason Returned: RTS-could not ID. Document Returned: Order. Action Taken: found new address and remailed to appellant. [21-2111, 21-2127, 21-2128] [Entered: 11/22/2021 04:48 PM]
November 18, 2021 [10873500] Supplemental preliminary record filed. Contents: Memorandum Opinion and Order. [21-2127] [Entered: 11/18/2021 04:22 PM]
November 9, 2021 [10871185] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. These matters are before the court on (1) a single document titled Memorandum of Facts and captioned for each of the three cases set forth here, and (2) a Memorandum, captioned only for 21-2127. Upon consideration, the court denies appellant's motion for the submission of all district court filings in 21-2127 as unnecessary. The court will address Mr. Sharp's request for the appointment of counsel in 21-2127 in a separate order. The court denies the remainder of appellant's request for relief without prejudice to the renewal of any substantive arguments in the opening brief. Please see order for detailed important information. Served on 11/09/2021. [21-2111, 21-2127, 21-2128] [Entered: 11/09/2021 03:51 PM]
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order [10871172] Order filed by Judge Tymkovich denying Appellant's motion to appoint attorney filed by Appellant Donald Sharp. Served on 11/09/2021. [21-2127] See order for details. [Entered: 11/09/2021 03:20 PM]
November 2, 2021 [10869340] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. This matter is before the court sup sponte. The filing fee in this appeal has not been paid. The appellant must either (1) pay the appellate filing fees to the district court or (2) show cause in writing why he should not be required to prepay the entire filing fee. Response due on 11/23/2021 for Donald Sharp. Served on 11/02/2021. [21-2127]See order for details [Entered: 11/02/2021 01:14 PM]
November 1, 2021 [10868882] Entry of appearance filed by Donald Sharp. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 10/28/2021. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-2127] [Entered: 11/01/2021 01:22 PM]
November 1, 2021 [10871092] Memorandum of Facts filed by Donald Sharp in 21-2111, 21-2127, 21-2128. Served on 10/25/2021. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-2111, 21-2127, 21-2128] [Entered: 11/09/2021 12:56 PM]
November 1, 2021 [10871146] Appellant's motion filed by Donald Sharp to appoint attorney as contained in the memorandum. TEXT ONLY. Served on 10/25/2021. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-2127] [Entered: 11/09/2021 02:35 PM]
November 1, 2021 [10871096] Memorandum filed by Donald Sharp. Served on 10/25/2021. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-2127] [Entered: 11/09/2021 12:59 PM]
October 20, 2021 [10866350] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 10/20/2021. Fee or 1915 forms and notice of appearance due 11/22/2021 for Donald Sharp. [21-2127] [Entered: 10/20/2021 09:31 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sharp v. Garza, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DONALD SHARP
Represented By: Donald Sharp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CARMEN E. GARZA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LAURA FASHING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARTHA VAZQUEZ, District Director
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KEA W. RIGGS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STEVEN C. YARBROUGH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GREGORY B. WORMUTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN F. ROBBENHAAR, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ALL FEDERAL JUDGES OF THE UNITED STATES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?