Seawood v. McBrayshaw, et al
| DENORVAL LEMONT SEAWOOD |
| (FNU) MCBRAYSHAW, Nurse/ARNP, Corizon Health Services, Inc., CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., DANIELLE WAGNER, Grievance Personnel, Lansing Correctional Facility, SHANNON MYERS, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections, LANSING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, (FNU) HAGEDORN, Unit Team, Lansing Correctional Facility, CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE INC., LLC, Medical Care Provider, Lansing Correctional Facility, THE CITY OF TOPEKA, KANSAS and (FNU) (LNU), Shareholders, Corizon Health Services, Inc. |
| 21-3227 |
| December 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10890584] Mandate issued. [21-3227] [Entered: 02/03/2022 11:18 AM] |
| [10890580] Default; Procedural termination without judicial action; Clerk of the Court. [21-3227] [Entered: 02/03/2022 11:14 AM] |
| [10885592] Deficiency notice issued. Type of deficiency: appellant has not filed a response to the court's 12/17/21 order. Appellant's memorandum brief due 01/24/2022 for Denorval Lemont Seawood. [21-3227] [Entered: 01/13/2022 08:42 AM] |
| [10880202] Jurisdiction challenged. Appellant's memorandum brief due 01/07/2022 for Denorval Lemont Seawood. Briefing on the merits of this appeal is suspended pending further order of the court. [21-3227] [Entered: 12/17/2021 07:41 AM] |
| [10880134] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 12/16/2021. Fee or 1915 forms and notice of appearance due on 01/18/2022 for Denorval Lemont Seawood. [21-3227] [Entered: 12/16/2021 03:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
