United States v. Mack
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| SHANE LEE MACK, JR. |
| 21-4100 |
| August 17, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10850988] Criminal case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 08/17/2021. Docketing statement, designation of record, transcript order form, appointment motion and notice of appearance due 08/31/2021 for Shane Lee Mack Jr.. Notice of appearance due on 08/31/2021 for United States of America. [21-4100] [Entered: 08/17/2021 10:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Mack | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Patrick Dent |
| Represented By: | Jay T. Winward |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: SHANE LEE MACK, JR. | |
| Represented By: | Jack B. Burns |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
