Lockett v. Webco Industries
| WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC., previously named as Webco, Inc. |
| CEDRICK LOCKETT |
| 21-5041 |
| June 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10843465] Appellant's brief filed by Cedrick Lockett. Served on 07/07/2021 by US mail. Required 10th Cir. R. 28.2 Attachments Included? n. Appellee's brief due 08/06/2021 for Webco Industries, Inc. [21-5041] [Entered: 07/13/2021 03:04 PM] |
| [10835604] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Volume 1 pleadings. [21-5041] [Entered: 06/09/2021 10:01 AM] |
| [10834376] District court order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. [21-5041] [Entered: 06/03/2021 11:00 AM] |
| [10834377] Jurisdictional review complete. Appellant's brief due on 07/13/2021 for Cedrick Lockett. Record on appeal due for 10th circuit 06/24/2021. [21-5041] [Entered: 06/03/2021 11:02 AM] |
| [10834370] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Jacob Samuel Crawford for Webco Industries, Inc. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 06/03/2021. Manner of Service: US mail, email. [21-5041] [Entered: 06/03/2021 10:56 AM] |
| [10834331] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. William Kirk Turner for Webco Industries, Inc.. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 06/03/2021. Manner of Service: email, US mail [21-5041] [Entered: 06/03/2021 09:59 AM] |
| [10834313] Entry of appearance submitted by JACOB S CRAWFORD for Appellee Webco Industries, Inc. for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 06/03/2021. Manner of Service: email, US mail. [21-5041] --[Edited 06/03/2021 by SLS to remove PDF from docket entry as the document has been filed.] JSC [Entered: 06/03/2021 09:36 AM] |
| [10834314] Entry of appearance submitted by WILLIAM KIRK TURNER for Appellee Webco Industries, Inc. for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 06/03/2021. Manner of Service: email, US mail. --[Edited 06/03/2021 by MLB to remove pdf from docket; entry filed on 06/03/21][21-5041] JSC [Entered: 06/03/2021 09:36 AM] |
| [10833785] Entry of appearance filed by Cedrick Lockett. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 06/01/2021. Manner of Service: email. [21-5041] [Entered: 06/01/2021 06:59 PM] |
| [10833784] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 06/01/2021 Fee is due by 07/01/2021 for Cedrick Lockett. Notice of appearance due on 07/01/2021 for Cedrick Lockett, and Notice of appearance due on 06/15/2021 for Webco Industries, Inc. [21-5041] [Entered: 06/01/2021 06:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lockett v. Webco Industries | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC., previously named as Webco, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jacob Samuel Crawford |
| Represented By: | William Kirk Turner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: CEDRICK LOCKETT | |
| Represented By: | Cedrick Lockett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
