In re: Powell
| In re: JOHN REGINALD POWELL |
| JIM FARRIS, Warden |
| 21-6090 |
| August 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10849371] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. John Reginald Powell. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y (none listed on back of the entry). Served on 08/10/2021. Manner of Service: email. [21-6090] [Entered: 08/10/2021 08:06 AM] |
| [10849320] Case docketed. Petition for permission to file successive 2254 habeas petition in district court. DATE RECEIVED: 08/09/2021. [21-6090] [Entered: 08/09/2021 04:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Powell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: JOHN REGINALD POWELL | |
| Represented By: | John Reginald Powell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: JIM FARRIS, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Hunter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
