Logsdon v. United States Marshal Service, et al
| DONALD RAY LOGSDON, JR. |
| UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, PHILIP BRIAN GILLIAM, Deputy, United States Marshal, JERE SMITH, United States Marshal and CODY VAUGHN, Task Force Officer, United States Marshal Service |
| 21-7070 |
| December 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10889574] Miscellaneous correspondence received from Donald Ray Logsdon, Jr. but not filed. Response letter sent. Served on 01/31/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-7070] [Entered: 01/31/2022 01:50 PM] |
| [10886756] Jurisdictional Defect. Procedural termination after other judicial action. Written, unsigned, unpublished. Judges Tymkovich, Matheson and Eid. [21-7070] [Entered: 01/19/2022 09:56 AM] |
| [10886391] Entry of appearance filed by Donald Ray Logsdon, Jr. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 01/11/2022 on court only. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-7070] [Entered: 01/18/2022 11:56 AM] |
| [10886394] Response to 12/29/2021 order filed by Donald Ray Logsdon, Jr. Served on 01/11/2022 on court only. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-7070] [Entered: 01/18/2022 11:57 AM] |
| [10882603] Jurisdiction challenged. Response due on 01/19/2022 for Donald Ray Logsdon Jr. Proceedings suspended pending further order of the court. [21-7070] [Entered: 12/29/2021 11:46 AM] |
| [10882227] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 12/27/2021. Notice of appearance and fee or 1915 forms due 01/27/2022 for Donald Ray Logsdon Jr. [21-7070] [Entered: 12/28/2021 08:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.