Nelson v. Williams, et al
| LACIE NELSON |
| DEAN WILLIAMS, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections and PHIL WEISER, Attorney General, State of Colorado |
| 22-1085 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10909839] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 2, Comments: Vol 1 - pleadings, Vol 2 - state court record (in hard copy). Hard copy filed in volume. Appellant's brief due on 06/08/2022 for Lacie Nelson. [22-1085] [Entered: 04/29/2022 10:24 AM] |
| [10904816] Minute order filed - Record on appeal due district court 04/28/2022. (Text Only - No Attachment) [22-1085] [Entered: 04/07/2022 07:14 AM] |
[10904903] Order filed by Judge Tymkovich granting attorney's motion to continue CJA appointment. Gail Johnson is appointed as attorney of record to represent the appellant, Lacie Nelson. Served on 04/07/2022. [22-1085] [Entered: 04/07/2022 09:34 AM]
|
| [10904797] Motion filed by Appellant Lacie Nelson to continue appointment. Served on: 04/06/2022. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [22-1085] GJ [Entered: 04/06/2022 05:21 PM] |
| [10904806] Entry of appearance filed by Gail Johnson for Lacie Nelson. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 04/06/2022. Manner of Service: email [22-1085] [Entered: 04/07/2022 06:05 AM] |
| [10904793] Notice that a transcript is not necessary for this appeal filed by Lacie Nelson. Served on: 04/06/2022. Manner of Service: email. --[Edited 04/07/2022 by SDS to correct event and modify text] [22-1085] GJ [Entered: 04/06/2022 04:56 PM] |
| [10904792] Designation of record filed by Appellant Lacie Nelson. Served on 04/06/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-1085] GJ [Entered: 04/06/2022 04:51 PM] |
| [10904788] Docketing statement filed by Lacie Nelson. Served on 04/06/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-1085] GJ [Entered: 04/06/2022 04:40 PM] |
| [10904787] Entry of appearance submitted by Gail K. Johnson for Appellant Lacie Nelson for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 04/06/2022. Manner of Service: email. --[Edited 04/07/2022 by JJH to remove pdf as pleading filed 04/06/2022][22-1085] GJ [Entered: 04/06/2022 04:38 PM] |
| [10904346] Entry of appearance submitted by Christine Brady for Appellees Phil Weiser and Dean Williamsn/a for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 04/05/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-1085] --[Edited 04/05/2022 by AT to remove pdf as pleading was filed on 4/5/2022.] CCB [Entered: 04/05/2022 01:20 PM] |
| [10904359] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Christine Cates Brady, Esq. for Dean Williams and Phil Weiser. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 04/05/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-1085] [Entered: 04/05/2022 01:29 PM] |
| [10901237] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 03/21/2022. The letter issued by the Court on March 21, 2022 was issued erroneously as counsel is court-appointed, not retained. Docketing statement, transcript order form, notice of appearance, designation of record, and appointment motion due 04/06/2022 for Lacie Nelson.. Notice of appearance due on 04/06/2022 for Phil Weiser and Dean Williams. [22-1085] [Entered: 03/23/2022 10:54 AM] |
| [10900472] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 03/21/2022. Transcript order form, fee, notice of appearance, and docketing statement is due 04/04/2022 for Lacie Nelson. Notice of appearance due on 04/04/2022 for, Phil Weiser and Dean Williams.[22-1085] [Entered: 03/21/2022 12:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
