Martinez v. Back Bone Bullies, et al
FRANCISCO JAVIER MARTINEZ |
BACK BONE BULLIES LTD., BROOKE SKILLO and GABE SKILLO |
22-1112 |
April 13, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10912809] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. This matter is now before the court on Mr. Martinez's response to the April 25, 2022 order. A decision regarding this court's jurisdiction over this appeal will not be made at this time. This appeal is abated pending the court's consideration of Case No. 22-703. Please see order for details. Served on 05/12/2022. [22-1112] [Entered: 05/12/2022 12:36 PM] |
This entry has been removed from the docket. [lg] An amended response was filed immediately after this one. [10911712] Response filed by Francisco Javier Martinez to 10th Circuit's Order to Show Cause. Served on 04/29/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [22-1112] PAD [Entered: 05/09/2022 08:47 AM] |
[10911716] Response filed by Francisco Javier Martinez to Response to 10th Circuit's Order to Show Cause. Served on 05/05/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [22-1112] PAD [Entered: 05/09/2022 08:53 AM] |
[10909168] Attorney Mr. Joshua Darwin Brown for Back Bone Bullies LTD., Brooke Skillo and Gabe Skillo admitted to the bar of this court. [22-1112] [Entered: 04/27/2022 10:32 AM] |
[10908468] Order filed by Clerk of the Court - This matter is before the court sua sponte to correct a clerical error. The order of 4/22/22 is vacated [ # 10908108-2 ]. Mr. Martinez is directed to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (please see order for further details). Response due on 05/09/2022 for Francisco Javier Martinez. Served on 04/25/2022. [22-1112] [Entered: 04/25/2022 10:00 AM] |
[10908108] Order filed by Clerk of the Court - On 4/19/22 Mr. Martinez filed a petition for permission to appeal which resulted in 22-703. The court notes that if a petition for permission is granted, a notice of appeal is not necessary. If permission is denied, this court would lack jurisdiction to consider this interlocutory appeal. Thus the notice of appeal was both premature and procedurally improper. This appeal is abated pending the court's consideration of the petition for permission to appeal in 22-703. All pending deadlines are vacated. Served on 04/22/2022. [22-1112] [Edited to reflect that per the court's order of 4/25/22, this order has been VACATED-- Edited 04/25/2022 by NA] [Entered: 04/22/2022 08:08 AM] |
[10907619] Admissions letter sent. Response date set to 05/20/2022 for Joshua Darwin Brown. [22-1112] [Entered: 04/20/2022 11:42 AM] |
[10907176] Entry of appearance submitted by Joshua D. Brown for Appellees Back Bone Bullies LTD., Brooke Skillo and Gabe Skillo for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 04/18/2022. Manner of Service: email.--[Edited 04/19/2022 by JJH to remove pdf as pleading filed 04/18/2022] [22-1112] JDB [Entered: 04/18/2022 05:40 PM] |
[10907186] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Joshua Darwin Brown for Back Bone Bullies LTD., Brooke Skillo and Gabe Skillo. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 04/18/2022. Manner of Service: email [22-1112] [Entered: 04/19/2022 06:26 AM] |
[10906220] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 04/13/2022. Docketing statement, transcript order form and entry of appearance due 04/27/2022 for Francisco Javier Martinez. Notice of appearance due on 04/27/2022 for Back Bone Bullies LTD., Brooke Skillo and Gabe Skillo [22-1112] [Entered: 04/13/2022 03:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.