Mackey v. City of Denver and the County of Denver
| SHAQUILLE TRAMAINE MACKEY |
| THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO |
| 22-1162 |
| May 20, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10923318] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. This matter is now before the court on a motion in which appellant states he needs more time to file specific objections to the magistrate's report and recommendation. Accordingly, the court construes as a motion for extension of time. The motion as construed, is granted. Response now due on 07/14/2022 for Shaquille Tramaine Mackey. Served on 06/30/2022. [22-1162] [Entered: 06/30/2022 09:39 AM] |
| [10923152] Appellant's motion filed by Shaquille Tramaine Mackey in 22-1162 and 22-1159 to extend time to file the response to the show cause orders until unspecified date. Served on 06/29/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. [22-1162, 22-1159] [Entered: 06/29/2022 03:16 PM] |
| [10923150] Entry of appearance filed by Shaquille Tramaine Mackey. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. [22-1162] [Entered: 06/29/2022 03:14 PM] |
| [10918879] Order filed by Clerk of the Court - The court directs Mr. Mackey to file a supplemental memorandum brief that answers the question set forth. Response due on 06/23/2022 for Shaquille Tramaine Mackey. In the alternative, Mr. Mackey may voluntarily dismiss the appeal or elect not to file a response, in which case the court will dismiss the appeal. (please see order for further details). Served on 06/09/2022. [22-1162] [Entered: 06/09/2022 01:25 PM] |
| [10923149] Miscellaneous correspondence filed by Shaquille Tramaine Mackey. Served on 06/08/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. [22-1162] [Entered: 06/29/2022 03:11 PM] |
| [10914949] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. This matter is before the court on its own initiative following the opening of this appeal and review of the district court docket. Appellant shall show cause in writing why he has not waived his right to appellate review of the district court's dismissal order by failing to file specific objections the report and recommendation underlying it.. Response due on 06/13/2022 for Shaquille Tramaine Mackey. See order for specifics. Served on 05/23/2022. [22-1162] [Entered: 05/23/2022 10:48 AM] |
| [10914575] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 05/19/2022. Fee or ifp forms due 06/21/2022 for Shaquille Tramaine Mackey. Notice of appearance due on 06/21/2022 for Shaquille Tramaine Mackey. [22-1162] [Entered: 05/20/2022 07:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mackey v. City of Denver and the County of Denver | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: SHAQUILLE TRAMAINE MACKEY | |
| Represented By: | Shaquille Tramaine Mackey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
