Lewis v. Peabody Rocky Mountain Services
| SARAH LEWIS |
| PEABODY ROCKY MOUNTAIN SERVICES, LLC |
| 22-1349 |
| October 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Americans with Disab. Act-Empl |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Lewis v. Peabody Rocky Mountain Services |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10960691] Order filed by Clerk of the Court - granting Appellee's first unopposed motion to extend time to file eres brief (21 days). Appellee's brief now due 01/24/2023 for Peabody Rocky Mountain Services, LLC. Served on 12/08/2022. Text only entry - no attachment. [22-1349] [Entered: 12/08/2022 02:23 PM] |
| [10960689] Motion filed by Appellee Peabody Rocky Mountain Services, LLC to extend time to file appellee/respondent's brief until 01/24/2023. Served on: 12/08/2022. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [22-1349] CLO [Entered: 12/08/2022 02:08 PM] |
| [10959533] Paper copies of appellant's brief and appendix received from Sarah Lewis. [22-1349] [Entered: 12/05/2022 09:10 AM] |
| [10959184] Minute order filed - the brief and appendix submitted by appellant is accepted for filing. Paper copies shall now be filed with the court within 5 business days of this order. All copies must be exact replicas of the electronic filings, including all attachments and number of volumes filed for appendices. Paper copies of appellant's brief and appendix due 12/09/2022 by Sarah Lewis. Appellee's brief now due 01/03/2023 for Peabody Rocky Mountain Services, LLC. (Text Only - No Attachment) [22-1349] [Entered: 12/02/2022 08:14 AM] |
| [10959175] Appendix filed by Appellant Sarah Lewis. Number of volumes: 1. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [docketed by clerk as appendix was attached to brief entry] [22-1349] [Entered: 12/02/2022 07:50 AM] |
| [10959155] Appellant/Petitioner's brief filed by Sarah Lewis. Served on 12/01/2022 by email. Oral argument requested? Yes. Word/page count: 7637. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. --[Edited 12/02/2022 by SDS to remove appendix pdf from entry as it has been docketed separately by clerk] [22-1349] RML [Entered: 12/01/2022 04:29 PM] |
| [10949652] Filed notice record is complete. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. Served on 10/24/2022. Appellan's brief and appendix due on 12/05/2022 for Sarah Lewis. [22-1349] [Entered: 10/24/2022 10:05 AM] |
| [10949733] Entry of appearance submitted by Christopher L. Ottele and Owen M. Davis for Appellee Peabody Rocky Mountain Services, LLC for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 10/24/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-1349] [Edited to remove PDF as pleading has been filed-- Edited 10/24/2022 by NA] CLO [Entered: 10/24/2022 12:16 PM] |
| [10949745] Entry of appearance filed by Owen Davis and Mr. Christopher Larry Ottele for Peabody Rocky Mountain Services, LLC. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 10/24/2022. Manner of Service: email [22-1349] [Entered: 10/24/2022 12:28 PM] |
| [10948505] Entry of appearance submitted by Robert Liechty for Appellant Sarah Lewis for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 10/18/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-1349] [Edited to remove PDF as pleading has been filed-- Edited 10/18/2022 by NA] RML [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:19 AM] |
| [10948506] Notice that a transcript is not necessary filed by Sarah Lewis. Served on: 10/18/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-1349]--[Edited 10/18/2022 by LG to correct event code] RML [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:20 AM] |
| [10948509] Docketing statement filed by Sarah Lewis. Served on 10/18/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-1349] RML [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:21 AM] |
| [10948513] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Robert M. Liechty, Esq. for Sarah Lewis. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 10/18/2022. Manner of Service: email [22-1349] [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:26 AM] |
| [10948519] Minute order filed - Notice due that record is complete by 10/25/2022 for Jeffrey P. Colwell, Clerk of Court (oclk). (Text Only - No Attachment) [22-1349] [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:35 AM] |
| [10947813] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 10/14/2022 Docketing statement due 10/28/2022 for Sarah Lewis. Transcript order form due 10/28/2022 for Sarah Lewis. Notice of appearance due on 10/28/2022 for Sarah Lewis and Peabody Rocky Mountain Services, LLC. [22-1349] [Entered: 10/14/2022 12:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lewis v. Peabody Rocky Mountain Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: SARAH LEWIS | |
| Represented By: | Robert M. Liechty Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: PEABODY ROCKY MOUNTAIN SERVICES, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Sonia Nicole Anderson |
| Represented By: | Christopher Larry Ottele |
| Represented By: | Owen Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
