Baker v. United Parcel Service, et al
| JOHN BAKER |
| UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and LEO LANE |
| 22-2035 |
| March 24, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Employee Retirement |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10905507] Notice of Mediation Conference filed by the Tenth Circuit Mediation Office. Telephone conference scheduled for 04/26/2022 at 10:00 am (MT). The mediation contact form must be completed and returned to the Mediation Office within four days of the date of this notice. [Please open the Notice for important information.] [22-2035] [Entered: 04/11/2022 11:02 AM] |
| [10905419] Filed notice record is complete. Served on 04/11/2022. Appellant's brief and appendix due on 05/23/2022 for John Baker. [22-2035] [Entered: 04/11/2022 08:38 AM] |
| [10905366] Docketing statement filed by John Baker. Served on 04/09/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-2035] CPL [Entered: 04/09/2022 01:03 PM] |
| [10905118] Minute order filed - Notice due that record is complete by 04/15/2022 for Mitchell R. Elfers, Clerk of Court (oclk). (Text Only - No Attachment) [22-2035] [Entered: 04/08/2022 07:15 AM] |
| [10905123] Entry of appearance filed by Christopher Paul Lucero for John Baker. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 04/07/2022. Manner of Service: email [22-2035] [Entered: 04/08/2022 07:46 AM] |
| [10905152] Notice of deficient docketing statement received from John Baker. Type of deficiency: The docketing statement is not filled out. Docketing statement due 04/11/2022 for John Baker. [22-2035] [Entered: 04/08/2022 09:03 AM] |
| This entry has been removed from the docket. [lg] This was cited as deficient. A corrected one has now been filed. [10905103] Docketing statement filed by John Baker. Served on 04/07/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-2035] CPL [Entered: 04/07/2022 05:23 PM] |
| [10905099] Acknowledgment of transcript order filed by John Baker. Transcript ordered: Served on: 04/04/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-2035] CPL [Entered: 04/07/2022 05:00 PM] |
| This duplicate docket entry has been removed from the docket as counsel refiled docketing statement with attorney signature. [at] [10905098] Docketing statement filed by John Baker. Served on 04/07/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-2035] CPL [Entered: 04/07/2022 04:58 PM] |
| [10905097] Entry of appearance submitted by Christopher P Lucero for Appellant John Baker for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 04/07/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-2035]--[Edited 04/08/2022 by LG to remove PDF from entry, as pleading was filed on 4/8/2022] CPL [Entered: 04/07/2022 04:57 PM] |
| [10904058] Entry of appearance submitted by Sarah L. Shore and Monica R. Garcia for Appellees Leo Lane and United Parcel Service, Inc. for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 04/04/2022. Manner of Service: email. [22-2035]--[Edited 04/04/2022 by LG to remove PDF from entry, as pleading was filed on 4/4/2022] SLS [Entered: 04/04/2022 03:49 PM] |
| [10904064] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Monica R Garcia and Ms. Sarah L. Shore for United Parcel Service, Inc. and Leo Lane. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 04/04/2022. Manner of Service: email [22-2035] [Entered: 04/04/2022 03:56 PM] |
| [10901933] Notice of an NDA re-sent to Sarah Shore. [22-2035] [Entered: 03/25/2022 02:32 PM] |
| [10901567] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 03/24/2022. Docketing statement, transcript order form and entry of appearance due 04/07/2022 for John Baker. Notice of appearance due on 04/07/2022 for Leo Lane and United Parcel Service, Inc. [22-2035] [Entered: 03/24/2022 11:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
