Allen v. Meyer
| JOSEPH LEE ALLEN |
| SHANNON MEYER |
| 22-3028 |
| February 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10902314] Appellant brief and application for certificate of appealability filed by Joseph Lee Allen. Original. Clerk made 4 copies. Served on 03/23/2022 by US Mail. [22-3028] [Entered: 03/29/2022 09:03 AM] |
| [10895715] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Joseph Lee Allen. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y (already listed in the appeal). Served on 02/28/2022. Manner of Service: Clerk via email. [22-3028] [Entered: 02/28/2022 01:56 PM] |
| [10895429] Attorney Michael Ryan Serra for Shannon Meyer admitted to the bar of this court. [22-3028] [Entered: 02/25/2022 02:50 PM] |
| [10894627] Admissions letter sent. Response date set to 03/25/2022 for Michael Ryan Serra. [22-3028] [Entered: 02/23/2022 09:17 AM] |
| [10893943] Entry of appearance filed by Kristafer R. Ailslieger and Michael Ryan Serra for Shannon Meyer. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 02/18/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. [22-3028] [Entered: 02/18/2022 09:11 AM] |
| [10893941] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 3. Volume I - Pleadings; Volume II - State Court Record; and Volume III - Pleadings (continued). [22-3028] [Entered: 02/18/2022 09:05 AM] |
| [10893940] Appellee's notice that a response brief will not be filed by Shannon Meyer. Served on 02/18/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. [22-3028] KRA [Entered: 02/18/2022 09:00 AM] |
| [10893939] Entry of appearance submitted by Kristafer R. Ailslieger, Michael R. Serra for Appellee Shannon Meyer for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 02/18/2022. Manner of Service: US mail. [22-3028] --[Edited 02/18/2022 by SLS to remove PDF from docket entry as the document has been filed.] KRA [Entered: 02/18/2022 08:59 AM] |
| [10893760] District court order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. Petitioners motion for a certificate of appealability is denied. [22-3028] [Entered: 02/17/2022 12:23 PM] |
| [10893763] Jurisdictional review complete. Appellant's brief and Certificate of Appealability due 03/29/2022 for Joseph Lee Allen. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 03/10/2022 [22-3028] [Entered: 02/17/2022 12:25 PM] |
| [10893552] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 02/16/2022. Ruling on IFP forms due in district court 03/18/2022 for Joseph Lee Allen. Notice of appearance due on 03/18/2022 for Joseph Lee Allen. Notice of appearance due on 03/02/2022 for Shannon Meyer. [22-3028] [Entered: 02/16/2022 04:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Allen v. Meyer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: JOSEPH LEE ALLEN | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Lee Allen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: SHANNON MEYER | |
| Represented By: | Kristafer R. Ailslieger |
| Represented By: | Michael Ryan Serra |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
